by sigmaprimus on 2/22/22, 2:31 AM with 5 comments
To my surprise the question was flagged and there appeared a "past" link beneath the question. This link lead me to what I would consider a vulgar commentary full of prolific language.
my question is how exactly is a question supposed to be phrased to avoid being "Flagged" and subsequently censored by what I can only imagine is an individual with an agenda contrary to the subject of my inquiry?
by nathanaldensr on 2/22/22, 3:53 AM
In other words, don't take it personally.
by mtmail on 2/22/22, 7:03 AM
The “past” link is dumb and automated. It just links to a title search. Usually used to find duplicate stories. For example if somebody submits a story about a breaking-news topic that has been submitted 10 times from other sources in short amount of time. It’s not meant to link to a specific story, what you saw is likely a random result.
by ggm on 2/22/22, 3:30 AM
And I say that, as somebody who is very likely to be contributing to the mess because I am unsure I can restrain myself from polemic. Dislike of these individuals shouldn't colour honest debate, but I struggle with this. I don't believe in some (false) moral euivalency here, and I know that has direct impact on the quality of discourse.
by DrScump on 2/22/22, 4:44 AM
by sigmaprimus on 2/22/22, 2:34 AM
I just searched for "Ask HN: Opinions on Jordan Peterson?" on Hacker News - Hacker News Search https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Ask%20HN%3A%20Opinions%20on%20...