by prvnsmpth on 2/11/22, 1:19 PM with 61 comments
by 3pt14159 on 2/11/22, 2:01 PM
by scubbo on 2/11/22, 5:21 PM
(Seriously - cool idea, nice execution!)
[0] https://blog.scubbo.org/posts/cheating-at-word-games-part-2/
by gsoto on 2/11/22, 2:12 PM
A way to make this a bit easier would be allowing a nonexistent word once per game or something like that.
> the red tile indicates the number of correct characters in the correct position
I suggest using another color for that, as red is associated with error most of the time. Why not using the green/yellow for the numbers too?
by marcofatica on 2/11/22, 2:45 PM
by paulluuk on 2/14/22, 9:02 AM
E.g. let's say 'piano' gives you 0/1 and 'lemur' gives you 1/0, how do I proceed from there?
I'd know that the word will contain one of 'lemur' in that exact position, and none of the others. Likewise one of 'piano' but not in that position.
So the number of combinations possible right now is 5x(5x4)=100, each with 3 open slots that can contain 26-8=18 other characters. So 100x18x18x18=583200 options. And I only have a few guesses left.
So let's see if we can narrow it down with a word like 'jumpy'. I'm already screwing up now because I've used the letters 'u' and 'p' before already. Let's say 'jumpy' returns 0/0.
Did this narrow a lot down for me? I now know that we can ignore p and u, which means our options went down from 583200 options to 216000 options.
If I keep this up, I might get down to roughly 14000 options by the final line. Granted that only a few of these will be valid words, but still more than enough options to randomly guess.
So far I have not been able to get more than 1 letter correct.
by nreece on 2/12/22, 3:33 AM
by smallerfish on 2/11/22, 5:49 PM
My first real program (age 8) was an implementation of mastermind written in gwbasic. IIRC it worked surprisingly well.
Request - cursor keys, overtyping, delete, etc should work better. Right now there are a few glitches in the cells.
by IneffablePigeon on 2/11/22, 3:11 PM
by greatjack613 on 2/11/22, 7:09 PM
I am currently using https://wordlle.app, but it still contains Google Analytics.
Does anyone here know of a clone that has absolutely zero tracking?
by cuteboy19 on 2/11/22, 2:47 PM
by bradhensen on 2/11/22, 2:29 PM
by altairprime on 2/11/22, 3:05 PM
by dplgk on 2/12/22, 1:24 PM
by not2b on 2/11/22, 5:57 PM
by theschmed on 2/11/22, 2:04 PM
by foolinaround on 2/11/22, 3:33 PM
by chromaton on 2/11/22, 2:22 PM
by lupire on 2/11/22, 7:20 PM
by sc__ on 2/11/22, 2:16 PM
by foolinaround on 2/11/22, 3:25 PM
by vehemenz on 2/11/22, 2:49 PM
Wordle is cool, but short of purposely making bad guesses I'm not sure how anyone could lose at it.
by sib301 on 2/11/22, 1:56 PM