by tima101 on 2/10/22, 4:05 PM with 228 comments
by teraflop on 2/10/22, 5:04 PM
Yes, the year-over-year inflation reached a new peak. But the month-over-month inflation rate has actually been declining since last October: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
So when organizations publish a new article every month saying inflation is "accelerating", they're being incredibly misleading.
by bko on 2/10/22, 4:53 PM
So far we've seen crazy asset inflation (weird the market is up 30% from pre-covid levels). But now we're seeing consumer price inflation. I'm afraid it's not like normal times where you can just "slow down" the economy by tweaking interest rates. You will need to do drastic measures to sop up the trillions in newly generated dollars.
by recursivedoubts on 2/10/22, 4:46 PM
I expect a lot of chaos with the economy whipping between inflation and deflation over the next few years as the Fed tries to ride the tiger.
It's a good reason to never let rates get this low in the first place. From zero, any increase is an infinite increase in interest rates, and a corresponding crater of NPVs.
Welcome to the long run, folks. At least Keynes is dead, so, good for him, I guess.
by bryanlarsen on 2/10/22, 5:04 PM
1. The increase in money supply.
2. Supply chain bottlenecks.
3. Corporate greed & tech monopolies.
4. Fundamental supply constraints. (mostly in the housing sector)
Anybody trying to tell you that it's only or primarily one of them has a political motivation. It's all 4, with the first 2 being primary and both being important.
To effectively solve inflation we need to attack all 4.
by logicalmonster on 2/10/22, 4:57 PM
It feels like their strategy is to avoid making a choice and letting the bubble unwind as slowly as possible to avoid political fallout. Unfortunately, we learned as kids that ripping off a bandaid faster is usually best, so this might prolong pain for a while.
by newyankee on 2/10/22, 4:34 PM
by legitster on 2/10/22, 4:58 PM
But it's bizarre that interest rates are being held so low. It's unclear who it's supposed to help. I get that we need to boost the Covid economy, but if feels like the economy is currently running at every possible constraint - except for lack of money.
by JaimeThompson on 2/10/22, 5:19 PM
Could it be some of the inflation is simply companies taking advantage to raise prices not because they need to but simply because they can?
by ajsnigrutin on 2/10/22, 4:58 PM
(yes, I know it was not literally printed)
by sporkland on 2/10/22, 7:35 PM
by oxff on 2/10/22, 6:56 PM
"When you are paid not to notice, it is hard to notice" etc.
by marricks on 2/10/22, 4:51 PM
Which just goes to show, if WSJ or Bloomberg say something is bad, it may not actually be bad for you. Let's just hope the pressure stays up so wages keep on increasing.
EDIT:
I'd like to add, wage growth is outpacing inflation[1]. So those middle class family's with mortgages, lower middle class folks still with student debt, poor folks with credit card debt. This is a GOOD THING.
If you want to say wealthy people have more debts, sure in dollar amounts. But I bet dollars to donuts they have way more assets in stock than in their million dollar home mortgages or w/e.
by hirako2000 on 2/10/22, 4:32 PM
by mzs on 2/10/22, 4:47 PM
by snake_plissken on 2/10/22, 5:45 PM
I am under the impression that asset prices will decrease as we enter a cycle of increasing interest rates. Maybe someone can help out, but I can't remember the last time this kind of cycle did not end poorly i.e. a recession of some kind.
The Fed has to regain its credibility and the only way to do that (ex raising taxes, which they can't control) is to fight inflation via raising interest rates.
So can the US Government afford (politically and fiscally) a steep drop in asset prices (stocks, home values) precipitated by rising interest rates, as an entire generation (Baby Boomers) start to liquidate their retirement holdings? A large (+/-30%) drop in equities could take years to recover and would devastate many retirement plans just as people need that money and are forced to make divestments (by law) due to age. I think this is the biggest reason the Feds (both the Government and the Fed) will do everything to keep markets elevated/stable for the foreseeable future (although I haven't put any money on this).
The other thing I wonder about is, how high can rates go before the junk bond and repo markets start to price out companies, and those companies go under due to lack of short term financing.
by 6gvONxR4sf7o on 2/10/22, 5:09 PM
Like if everyone negotiates a 20% raise, prices of everything probably increase by 20%, meaning nobody gets shit, and their savings are less valuable. So they come out behind, if anything. But if everyone negotiates a four day work week for the same pay, or better safety standards at work, or shit like that, I'd bet prices don't inflate nearly as much, so they actually could come out ahead.
But that seems like a prisoner's dilemma kind of thing. If only you get the raise, you come out ahead. If everyone gets the raise, you come out neutral.
by adflux on 2/10/22, 4:38 PM
by mcs5280 on 2/10/22, 5:25 PM
by post_break on 2/10/22, 5:03 PM