by cherryblossom00 on 1/21/22, 11:29 PM with 29 comments
by ncmncm on 1/22/22, 2:11 PM
There is no practical need to enforce borrow checking on all debug builds: it suffices, for beginners, to know that a production build would fail. Forbidding any sort of testing until after the borrow checker is wholly satisfied generates pointless frustration. Can Rust really afford to drive beginners away? For Rust not to fizzle and die, it needs thousands to adopt it for each who already has. Saying "I persevered, you could too, given some backbone" is a recipe for failure.
Is it strictly worse to (1) let beginners deal with borrow checking a little later in their process, or for (2) the language to fizzle and die? Dying is still a punishingly likely prospect. Network effects matter. I doubt that failing to achieve mainstream adoption would be good for Rust, for current Rust users, or the world.
Everyone considering a language to learn has plenty of choices. A language rarely gets a second try.
by cherryblossom00 on 1/22/22, 2:09 AM
by mikewarot on 1/22/22, 3:41 AM
by errantmind on 1/22/22, 5:10 AM
by Waterluvian on 1/22/22, 1:17 PM