by i_dont_know_ on 1/15/22, 8:38 AM with 12 comments
I make everything sound like it's economics while discussing it, but I actually get 1000x more enjoyment out of my work and non-work lives under this time-split. There's some stigma around 'lazy' and 'work ethic' that I usually have to get around, but these are the ideal parameters for me to produce the most sustainably, and keep motivation up sustainably. So I figured this is just my weird quirk... valuing free time over money so much that I do something about it.
Recently, though, I've been interviewing candidates for some open tech positions and found a surprising number of them asking for the same thing in some form or another.
So I'm starting to wonder:
* Are there lots and lots of us that value free time over money, and there's just such a tight cultural stigma (even in our high-earning industry) around discussing it, so no one does?
* Are there lots and lots of us that have already instituted something like this with our employers/clients under some sort of "keep this between us" understanding? One of the larger companies I worked for, I was told to tell everyone that my day off was a day of 'focused work-from-home' out of fear that others might ask for something similar.
I'm just wondering what your experiences are, and if this is a weird niche quirk, or actually a cultural shift :)
by muzani on 1/15/22, 3:16 PM
It's probably very difficult to sell it as a discount. That implies 20% less work and the economics don't add up for that. That's 20% more people they have to hire, more managers, more complexity. Startups need to get things done faster because they have other fixed costs, and a trillion dollar company doesn't mind paying a little extra.
The nature of the work also means that people who put in the hours need to work less. They've made the mistakes, they make more accurate estimates, they know which theories don't work, they can debug more instinctively. They also have more battle tested code, simpler code, templates, hotkeys and macros. Managers are happy to hire someone who gets the sprint done by Wednesday then slacks off - but that can't be part of the contract, and it often involves hiring someone who has put in the hours.
I think the best way to go about it is agreeing to complete as much work, and arguing that 4 day weeks are the most efficient way to do this. Basically the industry tries to hire a senior who does as much work as 5 juniors for twice the salary, so this isn't an unrealistic idea.
by philmcp on 1/15/22, 10:48 AM
https://4dayweek.io/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-the-4-day-wor...
I too still find it weird why more companies don't offer at least a 4 day week @ 80% salary
by robtherobber on 1/15/22, 1:12 PM
by chrismeller on 1/15/22, 6:15 PM
by iExploder on 1/15/22, 5:48 PM
by taubek on 1/16/22, 6:42 PM
by gerardnico on 1/15/22, 10:13 AM