by aleyan on 12/20/21, 8:13 PM with 7 comments
by ddp26 on 12/21/21, 9:06 PM
Edit: it's a separate HN post, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29642210
by squidproquo on 12/21/21, 9:14 PM
by PeterCorless on 12/21/21, 9:34 PM
Otherwise you can run into self-fulfilling prophesies, where fascination with gloom-and-doom scenarios become rampant. Imagine the "QAnon-ization" of a "predictive market." Or, conversely, the positive feedback loop that would result in a tulipmania, or the kind of crypto-coin goldbugs' "Going to the moon."
In other words, you have to account for bad faith actors in a predictive market, manipulations to it, and inherent biases.
"Incentivizing" the "right" behavior doesn't work if people are unswayable from preset biases and presumptions.
Recall the debacle with Policy Analysis Market (PAM) from 2003:
• News: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna3072985
• Paper on the PAM: https://watermark.silverchair.com/itgg.2007.2.3.73.pdf?token...
(EDIT) Last note: Predictive markets tend to fail worst when trying to model for stochastic events — like terrorist attacks — which are inherently probabilistic, but not predictable. I use the analogy: "Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, BANANA!" How would you have predicated that based on prior data?