by hncurious on 12/17/21, 5:34 PM with 63 comments
by eightysixfour on 12/17/21, 7:13 PM
I think you can genericize it a bit and say humans are bad at defining themselves and need a reference point, and they often take the opposite stance of that reference point. I think this model fits in with that pretty well - there are groups who want to be "not-the-elite" which, if successful, the elite adopt. Classic "hipsterism."
It also fits in with a lot of local, national, and global politics, market differentiation, etc.
by optimalsolver on 12/17/21, 7:22 PM
by waingake on 12/17/21, 10:18 PM
by beebeepka on 12/17/21, 7:26 PM
Their observations align with my own - it's all about standing out. Me different because me better. Or vice versa. Same thing
by aszantu on 12/17/21, 8:54 PM
by j-bos on 12/17/21, 9:46 PM
by adamgordonbell on 12/17/21, 7:04 PM
Let’s explain fashion using cellular automata. This isn’t going to be cringe-inducingly nerdy at all!
https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/04/22/right-is-the-new-left/by crawfordcomeaux on 12/17/21, 8:00 PM
Any government, including human beings who identify as nations, can signal they've shifted to practicing such a culture by adopting the following symbol and integrating it into their symbology:
∀
This is the mathematic notation for the phrase "for all." A government that's operating on a model to meet all needs while denying none can signal this by including this symbol in their art, like flags, seals, etc.
by d883kd8 on 12/17/21, 7:28 PM
by shadowgovt on 12/17/21, 8:34 PM