by ageofwant on 11/30/21, 12:45 AM with 38 comments
by casion on 11/30/21, 3:12 AM
From my perspective:
- More difficult to search (single page manual is easy to ctrl-f, emacs built-in docs same)
- Difficult to read, styling plugins don't work well.
- MUCH more text on the screen at once. A single horizontal line is at least 2 separate contexts.
- Menu animations :(
- various styling errors (code blocks overlapping in safari for me)
- code copy also copies repl output... not very useful!
- font stylings reused but for different meanings
etc...
It feels like an interesting pet-project, but it doesn't feel like someone sat down and thought of a prioritized list of problems with the original documentation presentation... then fixed them.
It feels like someone wanted to try out some common web tropes on the emac docs.
by neilv on 11/30/21, 3:37 AM
It's ancient (Emacs had hypertext way before the Web existed), but, for some purposes, it can be much more efficient than anything in a Web browser.
by chlorion on 11/30/21, 6:20 AM
by defanor on 11/30/21, 8:46 AM
But generally looks like a potentially useful addition to other documentation output formats: they are supposed to be usable with different setups and under different conditions, and covering different preferences seems useful too. Even the Emacs web page [1] is in that "modern" style now, after all.
by timonoko on 11/30/21, 2:52 PM
(xterm-mouse-mode 1)
No special keyboard layout with arrow keys anymore.
No pecking character-per-character those tiny keys.I would consider accepting Nobel-prize for this discovery.
by nabilhat on 11/30/21, 5:32 AM
by NeutralForest on 11/30/21, 1:32 PM
by rhdxmr on 11/30/21, 8:27 AM
by jonnycomputer on 11/30/21, 1:16 PM
I just worry that the documentation won't be kept up to date. Also, its nice to have versioned documentation available.
by tvorog on 11/30/21, 7:36 AM
by marco_craveiro on 11/30/21, 9:55 AM
by p2t2p on 11/30/21, 10:24 AM
by ossusermivami on 12/1/21, 8:44 AM
good work whoever did that