by charsi on 10/18/21, 11:25 AM with 99 comments
by naoru on 10/18/21, 3:32 PM
by factorialboy on 10/18/21, 2:51 PM
by jason0597 on 10/18/21, 2:43 PM
by charsi on 10/18/21, 5:07 PM
I like rufus on windows but it feels weird to fire up my gaming rig to write a linux usb. Usbimager is cross platform.
Also discovered this user's manual for usbimager -
https://gitlab.com/bztsrc/usbimager/raw/master/usbimager-man...
by colinfinck on 10/18/21, 2:41 PM
Usbimager looks nice in comparison to the bloated Balena Etcher, but otherwise very similar to the Win32DiskImager I'm already using. Or is there something I am missing?
by korse on 10/18/21, 3:56 PM
by izackp on 10/18/21, 3:46 PM
by automato on 10/19/21, 4:58 PM
by 1MachineElf on 10/18/21, 2:28 PM
Yes, Balena Etcher is popular, and it works well on different operating systems, but it's EXE installer is over 140 MB. That's far, far more than is needed for this functionality. Compare Balena Etcher on Windows to Win32DiskImager, which needs only 12 MB. UNetbootin accomplishes this with just 5 MB. Rufus gets it done with just over 1 MB. That's all you really need on Windows to accomplish this task.
On macOS, no 3rd party software is even required at all. It has a graphical Disk Utility program that makes this easy to do. Major Linux distros also have built-in GUI programs for this. For cross platform GUI, this Usbimager tool appears to fulfill the need too.
The bloat and potential attack surface of Balena Etcher makes me unreasonably sad. I would like to see less of it.
by marcodiego on 10/18/21, 2:01 PM
Electron apps may eat too much RAM, have their performance impact, but for an app that is seldom used and won't be running continuously in the background, that is really not a problem. Considering that hardware constantly evolves, even if such evolution has been slowing down, the benefits on portability for these apps are a price I'm very willing to pay for.
by AnonHP on 10/18/21, 1:51 PM
by BiteCode_dev on 10/18/21, 2:52 PM
This is, btw, not really an alternative to etcher, more like an alternative to rufus or unetbootin.
Indeed, the reason they made etcher was because they had too many help requests from hobbyists trying to flash their raspi sd cards. So they made a candy UI, and the requests dropped.
The candy UI is the main goal of etcher, if you remove that, then why not use the already very fine existing solutions?
by baal80spam on 10/18/21, 2:14 PM
I had to use Ether recently to write a Linux image to a pendrive (it didn't work when I used Rufus, they specifically stated on the site to use Etcher) and I couldn't believe what a piece of trash software that is.
To think I had to install an over a 100 MB application to do such a trivial task, it was mind-boggling.
by craftoman on 10/18/21, 2:37 PM
by NikolaeVarius on 10/18/21, 1:55 PM
by SavantIdiot on 10/18/21, 4:59 PM
I would be delighted if there was an alternative. I ask every time an Electron hate discussion pops up. Still nothing anywhere near as good for Node Server + Browser Framework.