by andyxor on 10/12/21, 12:18 AM with 24 comments
by porknubbins on 10/12/21, 3:31 AM
Thinking about why academia is especially susceptible to this, it seems like most faculty and staff there are in a position not unlike a high priest or clergy member in that they wield a lot of power as long as they are in the organization but have little or none in their own right and if they lost their position the likelihood of regaining it is very small. So what they all want to minimize is the risk of gaining the attention of a vengeful twitter mob. Its not like there is really a corresponding gain to the individual for standing up for academic freedom to balance the equation.
by codeecan on 10/12/21, 4:19 AM
Damn, I assumed he said something racist maybe, but this is what the issue was about, I just lost all respect for MIT.
by armagon on 10/12/21, 3:47 AM
by ramblerman on 10/12/21, 6:34 AM
So we're past the point of looking for racism. Even political opposition, or a viewpoint you don't agree with merits cancellation?
by finite_jest on 10/12/21, 12:29 AM
by EricE on 10/12/21, 3:39 PM
Wow - there was a time when one went to college for debate and dissent. It's the best way to hone one's intellectual sword.
No wonder universities churn out so many people unprepared to cope in the real world :p
by nickthemagicman on 10/12/21, 8:56 AM
This Twitter mob has also affected stand up comedy. In Dave Chapelles new special he talks about it a fair amount.
by OldHand2018 on 10/12/21, 4:49 AM
Princeton has exceeded their "Zoom quota" once and had to increase it to accommodate additional registrations. Is there some limit that they absolutely cannot exceed? Will they have to close registration at some point?
If so, then many people that were interested in the content of the lecture will be unable to view it. So... he is effectively going to be cancelled by the anti-cancellers.
by 908B64B197 on 10/12/21, 3:47 AM