by Overton-Window on 8/17/21, 1:13 AM with 18 comments
by dataflow on 8/17/21, 1:33 AM
by eucryphia on 8/17/21, 2:07 AM
The insane thing here: the _financial_ cost of the war in afghanistan, which lasted deacdes and involved hundreds of thousands of people, and logistical operations spanning the globe, is less than the amount of money we printed in 2020.
https://www.newsweek.com/how-much-did-war-afghanistan-cost-1...
Talk about 'reality being optional' - in the financial markets, it still very much is optional
https://www.thepullrequest.com/p/we-are-no-longer-a-serious-...
by droptablemain on 8/17/21, 1:30 AM
American military members: 2,448 U.S. contractors: 3,846 Afghan military/police: 66,000 Other allied troops: 1,144 Afghan civilians: 47,245 Taliban/opposition fighters: 51,191 Aid workers: 444 Journalists: 72
src: https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2021-08-14/cos...
by gnabgib on 8/17/21, 1:28 AM
by MR4D on 8/17/21, 1:54 AM
by kokken on 8/17/21, 2:15 AM
I've recently realized how much of the discourse around the word HAS to be trapped within terms the Americans can understand. Every experience that is not translated to Americana is 'confusing' or 'irrelevant'. Much like the Author himself points, the progressive wing of the Democratic Party has no idea what to say about a victory of an extremist group against the American Military-Industrial complex to the loss of minorities who themselves hate or dislike American progressivism.
by vlovich123 on 8/17/21, 1:29 AM
And yes, the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and on “terror” have clearly been mismanaged from the start in exactly the ways that critics predicted, but I don’t see meaningful differences in the way all administrations have bungled these things.