by clubdorothe on 8/3/21, 3:32 AM with 25 comments
by t0mek on 8/3/21, 6:51 AM
The double ”when” is quite funny here, given the nature of npm problem described in the article.
by marechalbernard on 8/3/21, 4:10 AM
by tus89 on 8/3/21, 4:15 AM
by marto1 on 8/3/21, 5:52 AM
by egberts on 8/3/21, 10:20 AM
Yeah, those who depend on the original but accidental “-“ package for its functionally should suffer any consequential breakage that may have resulted from it.
*insert*fake*tear*here*
by throwaway4good on 8/3/21, 6:02 AM
by hidden-spyder on 8/3/21, 5:01 AM
by James-Livesey on 8/3/21, 11:40 AM
...then a few lines further down the article:
> An npm package called "-" has scored almost 720,000 downloads since its publication on the npm registry, since early 2020.
Kinda frustrating that the same information is being written twice imo... And then two ads in a row follow that
by pajko on 8/3/21, 4:26 PM
by undebuggable on 8/3/21, 8:58 AM
by brundolf on 8/3/21, 4:16 AM
by tapout1960 on 8/4/21, 1:46 PM