by 0x456 on 6/23/21, 12:11 AM with 54 comments
by optimiz3 on 6/23/21, 2:25 AM
Case in point is Hawaii; attempts to bring the wild cat populations under control are immediately met with resistance from animal rights groups. This is in spite of the ongoing destruction to wild bird populations. One also has to be extremely careful about washing local vegetables, due to cats spreading toxoplasma.
by felixbraun on 6/23/21, 2:35 AM
Conclusion by the authors: the amount of toxoplasmic agents appeared to be related to the degree of deterioration of the immune status.
> Neuropathological studies in the brains of AIDS patients with opportunistic diseases: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8518200/
by adamnemecek on 6/23/21, 2:21 AM
There was a profile on him in the Atlantic in 2012 https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/03/how-you...
by giantg2 on 6/23/21, 2:32 AM
by rubicon33 on 6/23/21, 2:14 AM
Toxo is a perfect example. Chicken pocks is another. HPV a third.
Personally I believe "alergies" are actually the result of a viral infection probably from the common cold, that sets off a long term hyper reaction to airborn particles and pathogens. So things like pollen in the air sets off a huge response whereas for some people who never were infected with the virus, they don't get "alergies".
by jakubmazanec on 6/23/21, 5:31 PM
Also, in this article https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11... he says that "pathogen responsible for mood disorders in animals-injured subjects is probably not the protozoon Toxoplasma gondii but another organism; possibly the agent of cat-scratched disease – the bacteria Bartonella henselae." So did he discover yet another behaviour change inducing organism, or is he simply a shitty scientist? Let's have a look: he recruits respondents via Facebook, they take 4 psychological questionnaires (which are usually not very reliable and shouldn't be used in giant correlation tables) and finds effect sizes ranging from eta2 = 0.004 to eta2 = 0.045. Just look at this table - https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11... - results are significant because the sample size is 5000, but what are the practical differences? Barely 1 point on a scale that itself has reliability around 0.9 (which is good, but it still leads to standard measurement error greater than Flegr's effect sizes).
by beaner on 6/23/21, 2:38 AM
by slumdev on 6/23/21, 2:17 AM
Definitely still a global threat in 2021, but not the disease that most people have on the brain right now. (Unless they own a cat.)
by dempsey on 6/23/21, 4:10 AM
by ck2 on 6/23/21, 3:16 AM
But good luck getting the NIH/CDC to mention that drug name right now.
by echelon on 6/23/21, 2:05 AM
It might be a contributor to depression. What we do know is that it correlates positively with motorcycle deaths and risk taking behaviors [1]. Postmortem tests show this. (My old immunology professor used to say that toxoplasma indirectly leads to more organ donation.)
Keep your cats indoors. Or get a dog instead.
Toxo evolved to fuck with mice brains and make them not fear being eaten. Your brain operates on similar biochemistry.
Be careful.
[1] Not a direct citation, but similar claims : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC117239/