by benrmatthews on 5/15/21, 9:09 PM with 43 comments
by hoppyhoppy2 on 5/15/21, 11:44 PM
by simondotau on 5/16/21, 12:52 AM
Then Consumer Reports published a video showing how to defeat Tesla's multiple safety protections by intentionally misleading the vehicle's driver occupancy sensors. Tesla was blamed for having sensors that couldn't detect intentional misuse.
Turns out that Occam's Razor holds: this whole saga was nothing more than a moron doing stupid things in a high performance vehicle. It's a shame that so many people had such wildly different assumptions because it happened to be an electric car made by a company whose CEO is an eccentric nerd and twitter troll.
by mcguire on 5/16/21, 12:10 AM
by chmod775 on 5/16/21, 6:24 AM
That made me spit out my coffee. And not because I was laughing.
Journalists have to be one of the most tone-deaf and least sensitive groups of people on this planet. And I thought I was bad.
If you feel like you have to write an article like that mentioning people by their full names, by all means, fine. But maybe leave a grieving wife the fuck alone - at least for a few months. Find a family member that is a few steps removed if you can't contain yourself.
by spoonjim on 5/15/21, 11:13 PM
by metalman on 5/16/21, 12:03 AM
by ajross on 5/15/21, 11:52 PM
That's... what autopilot does. What's the allegation here? That he used autopilot correctly and filmed it?
More to the point, where's the allegation that autopilot was at fault here? The only detail I can find is that he hit an existing overturned vehicle in the middle of the night. That's actually a routine kind of accident for human drivers, who aren't prepared to see stationary objects in the road. Add to that "2:30am" and I think it's pretty clear we'd all view this as a terrible but unavoidable tragedy in any other vehicle.
Again, what's the actual story here? I know what they want us to think based on the headline and lede. I just don't see that in the text of the article. Someone help me out here.