by aleyan on 4/16/21, 6:00 PM with 44 comments
by NickNaraghi on 4/16/21, 6:31 PM
I'm really hopeful that invention, like the ideas represented on this list, will get more attention and excitement from our youngest and smartest minds. In fact, I believe that having a successful society is dependent on this.
[0]: https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/company-news/2020-letter-to...
by mikepurvis on 4/16/21, 7:35 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research
by whoisjuan on 4/16/21, 7:41 PM
by outside1234 on 4/16/21, 6:55 PM
by imwillofficial on 4/16/21, 10:16 PM
So much for my weekend...
::rolls up sleeves::
“Memristors you say?”
::is never seen again::
by Laakeri on 4/16/21, 7:44 PM
by russellbeattie on 4/16/21, 8:08 PM
* Late 30s: Radio
* Late 40s: Vinyl Records (Edited: Atomic energy isn't a consumer product)
* Late 50s: TV
* Late 60s: Transistors / rockets
* Late 70s: Microcomputers.
* Late 80s: Desktop publishing
* Late 90s: Internet/Web
* Late 00s: Smartphones/tablets
* Late 10s: VR? Streaming media? Electric cars? Cryptocurrency?
It takes a while for a new technology to spread to widespread adoption. For example, the 2007 launch of the iPhone lead to a decade of mobile adoption a few years later. But it seems there's been no new tech paradigm shift lately that's equivalent to the massive influence of previous innovations. Or at least I'm not seeing it yet.
by agnosticmantis on 4/16/21, 7:34 PM
by Borrible on 4/18/21, 4:46 AM
Like, say, electric cars in 1900-1915?
by alexfromapex on 4/16/21, 6:54 PM
by FabiansMustDie on 4/16/21, 7:39 PM
Wikipedia is decent for a quick overview of a certain topic; but "boy oh boy," is it useless for anything of substance and depth.
All of these technologies, merely glossed over. Many, perhaps, even complete bunk with no realistic applications or time-frames for usable prototypes, all mixed in together!
Junk food for the mind.