from Hacker News

OBS Studio Now Ready with Wayland Capture Support

by infomax on 3/31/21, 9:53 AM with 67 comments

  • by mariusor on 3/31/21, 11:43 AM

    I think the original blog post from the developer is a better link: https://feaneron.com/2021/03/30/obs-studio-on-wayland/

    Michael added zero extra information on top of that.

  • by marcodiego on 3/31/21, 2:32 PM

    This is very good. Not only because it illustrates the maturity of wayland, this is been done using pipewire. The last remaining pieces of the puzzle are finally being placed. A modern linux distro will give you on the desktop a good oomd, good video drivers, pipewire, wayland, GTK 4, GNOME 40, a modern kernel, compiler, dev-tools... and modern cross distro software through flatpak/snap/appimage. There are still things to improve and fix, but the desktop has never been so promising.

    The sad thing: I've been hearing/saying basically this for decades.

  • by phone8675309 on 3/31/21, 1:12 PM

    What's up with the recent Flatpack/Snap fetish? Doesn't anybody just get their software into a distro anymore?

    Edit: EFF's recommendation for certbot, their ACME/LetsEncrypt client, is to use snap on a freaking server. Why?

  • by halz on 3/31/21, 1:35 PM

    Be advised that there is still an issue in the QTWayland front that makes OBS in Wayland rather unpleasant in practice; https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-81504 (via https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/issues/4295)
  • by jancsika on 3/31/21, 3:08 PM

    Are there people on here who regularly scrape HN posts for data?

    Because I'd love a list of user handles of people who-- before this day-- have written variations of, "Wayland-based systems have been totally ready for use for years now." And maybe a browser extension that greys out comments from those handles.

  • by jjice on 3/31/21, 1:15 PM

    When I made the jul over to full time Linux last February,this is something iran into and was confused about. Wayland was the default on Ubuntu, and it worked great! Except for a lot of applications that just wouldn't load... After some reading, I moved to X, but I can't wait for the day Wayland is ready to go.

    Will there ever be a good way to run things like dmenu on Wayland? I'm still a novice, but will all X programs need to be converted?

  • by infomax on 3/31/21, 1:02 PM

    Support for Wayland is getting up there. Just five days ago the bounty to support Wayland in Barrier was funded [1]

    [1] https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/issues/109#issuecomment...

  • by rijoja on 3/31/21, 12:45 PM

    Maybe a bit off topic but what is the status of wayland capture support anyway? Normally I used ffmpeg with x11 and that worked great. However due to the security model of wayland this doesn't seem nearly as easy to implement. I think they went with some kernel level grabbing support that needed root?
  • by yxhuvud on 3/31/21, 10:05 AM

    Nice. I suppose mounting the output as a virtual camera isn't supported yet?
  • by merb on 3/31/21, 11:09 AM

    maybe that will help microsoft teams to implement that functionality under linux.
  • by jhoechtl on 3/31/21, 12:46 PM

    Totally unrelated but: The day I can wireless screencast my Linux Laptop to my home television I will lite a candle.
  • by gpm on 3/31/21, 12:48 PM

    If I'm reading this right they support gnome, kde, and wlroots compositors, by sharing the protocols meant for screen sharing. Also they don't support capturing xwayland clients.
  • by roel_v on 3/31/21, 12:10 PM

    Now all that is left is virtual audio output...