by damsta on 3/8/21, 2:14 PM
Unfortunately projects like will probably force GH to remove Actions for free private repos and limit it for public repos in some way, like enabling it only for approved projects. Please stop abusing this feature.
by domano on 3/8/21, 8:31 AM
This goes against githubs TOS and is not the first project to do so.
by b1nj0y on 3/18/21, 2:51 AM
by joshmanders on 3/8/21, 6:23 PM
Please do not abuse Microsoft/GitHub's goodwill of giving free resources. This will just get them taken away from everyone.
by b1nj0y on 3/12/21, 2:26 AM
by andrew_ on 3/8/21, 2:05 PM
Hate to be sour grapes here, but this is nothing new. Every project that uses actions to publish a package, create a release commit and/or tag, and commit that to the repo is doing pretty much the same thing.
by sombremesa on 3/8/21, 3:52 PM
Is this anything besides a static website that could be hosted on S3 just as well? Seems like you're just using Actions to compile the static assets, which is probably not as good as doing it locally.