by Traster on 2/25/21, 8:42 PM
Congratulations to Twitter for discovering only fans, twitch, substack and Patreon. Personally I think this monetisation is slightly in the wrong direction - Twitter provides most high profile users free advertising of their external projects. It would seem more obvious to monetise that rather than trying to duplicate the external sites. No actual content on Twitter is currently worth a fee. Hell, lots of people are quitting even though it’s free.
by dporter on 2/25/21, 8:22 PM
The constraints of the Twitter platform make it uniquely bad to challenge something like Substack or Patreon, which leaves... Onlyfans as the only paid content platform they can take users from?
by MarkMc on 2/26/21, 1:03 AM
Ah so this is why Twitter stock has been on a rocketship recently.
This seems like a pretty good business move. Substack and Patreon have proved that people will pay to support their favourite content producers, and Twitter had the large user base to avoid the chicken-and-egg problem
by klmadfejno on 2/26/21, 2:08 AM
I don't really agree with the onlyfans comparisons. I think this sounds like a pretty smart move tbh. I cannot imagine a more lucrative ad target market than people who are willing to pay for the right to hear someone they like tell them what to buy.
by retox on 2/25/21, 10:40 PM
Countdown to the articles on twitter enabling the sale of child abuse content in 3...
by suyash on 2/25/21, 11:11 PM
So that means the free Twitter will become more crappy if they will put all the valuable information behind paywall?