by catchmilk on 2/25/21, 9:28 AM with 83 comments
by Paulster0031 on 2/25/21, 9:53 AM
The investment banking culture is notoriously brutal. Analysts typically work until midnight every day. Deals are unpredictable, deadlines are short and clients are demanding. There is a ritual known in banking circles as the “magic roundabout” — a graduate leaves his or her desk in the early hours of the morning, takes a cab home, and the taxi driver waits outside long enough for the young recruit to shower and change shirt before returning to the office.
https://www.ft.com/content/84adb5a4-2e53-11e6-a18d-a96ab29e3...
by llampx on 2/25/21, 9:47 AM
For GS, if their competitors are offering better working conditions, their top employees may switch over, leaving them with the ones who don't have a choice. Maybe he would better understand it as saying "Sales employees don't need a nice car or business class tickets or commissions to make sales." Technically true, but if your competitor is offering it you might want to do it as well.
by alibarber on 2/25/21, 9:53 AM
I had a space dedicated to work in that my employer paid for. Now I must make a part of my house that space and foot the bill.
by bennyp101 on 2/25/21, 9:49 AM
On the other hand, I can see why a large money firm would want to have people in the office using devices/assets that are under their control/watchful eye.
by apples_oranges on 2/25/21, 9:58 AM
by drenvuk on 2/25/21, 9:59 AM
The people working at home will be left out and it won't even be deliberate.
by pdimitar on 2/25/21, 11:27 AM
It's undeniable that some work absolutely mandates 100% physical presence. Denying this would be delusional. So when the job absolutely _mandates_ physical presence, sure, do that then.
But if anything, the pandemic very clearly has shown -- to me and my circle of colleagues and friends at least -- that insisting on a physical presence for IT workers is just being stubborn and backwards 99% of the time.
I am also not very convinced of the social aspect, watercooler discussions etc. I mean yeah, I miss them too sometimes but strictly speaking they are not a prerequisite for a productive IT worker. It's just a nice bonus. I found out that I can live without them (I am fully remotely working for 10 years now).
by say_it_as_it_is on 2/25/21, 10:11 AM
by andrejserafim on 2/25/21, 10:09 AM
GS is a big company. There's lots of people there. Some 8k people are in the tech division. And the employer competition there is not just with other financial firms. But also with the rest of the tech sector.
So as other commenters say, if other places offer similar conditions, but also remote work. It may be a differentiator. In practise though - working from home for tech some days a week has been totally normal for years. So I expect little actual impact on the company.
by myspy on 2/25/21, 10:04 AM
Obviously you need a cultural change and how you work, as in person communication must be done written. Biggest hindrance in efficiently working remotely when no one is doing that.
I totally get that these old companies have a problem to adapt. Especially if what someone else here wrote is that you are forced to work long hours just because.
by dustinmoris on 2/25/21, 10:05 AM
by _cs2017_ on 2/25/21, 10:03 AM
by celerrimus on 2/25/21, 10:35 AM
Also, I'm not sure that remote working will work for such businesses as banks, where keeping bank confidentiality may be hard or even impossible to enforce for remote workers. My girlfriend worked at bank once, they were very strict in controlling media drives, notes, even use of personal phones were not allowed near workstations.
by obayesshelton on 2/25/21, 10:04 AM
I will be doing a hybrid.
by EdwinLarkin on 2/25/21, 10:39 AM
by OJFord on 2/25/21, 10:14 AM
by christmm on 2/25/21, 9:52 AM