by allanmacgregor on 2/23/21, 1:28 PM with 40 comments
by bobbydallas on 2/23/21, 3:49 PM
The idea that you can assess an engineers ability to code AND collaborate with your team in a 3-5 hour window is just a losing battle. Hackerrank and triplebyte are good for the very large corps to rule people out and slim down the funnel. Not a real reflection of the work, code, or problems you will be solving in the job if hired.
15yrs tech recruiting corporate and agency. I have seen almost every tool out there and I will say very few have stood the test of time. Hiring is really hard and the fact remains there just isnt a one size fits all solution. Find the tools that suit your goals.
Personally I think small companies would be far better served investing in sourcing tools to attract and located the right talent. Have your leadership pitch these people directly hunt talent versus tools to automate volume (95% of which are not the people you are seeking any way).
by iwangulenko on 2/23/21, 3:01 PM
YCombinator funds startups, and startups need scale.
Hiring is very personal, very hard to automate and scale.
Often, tech hiring startups start in a creative way but later become a database of profiles where recruiters can source, similar to Linkedin. Aline Lerner, founder of https://interviewing.io, wrote about this problem here: https://blog.alinelerner.com/ive-been-an-engineer-and-a-recr...
by pjfin123 on 2/23/21, 3:55 PM
by jlizzle30 on 2/23/21, 4:13 PM
Value judgments aside, you have to respect Amazon's efficiency.
by muzani on 2/24/21, 2:46 AM
For some reason, degrees and certifications in software are not reliable. You could have a PhD in math and they'll still make you do algorithms on whiteboards. It sounds like the proper solution isn't to improve the interviewing process, but to improve education, or rather have a better certification process that makes these things unnecessary.
by snarf21 on 2/23/21, 2:17 PM
by rafael86 on 2/24/21, 6:40 AM
We are a startup trying to improve the software engineering hiring process. What we are doing?
- We are standardizing the way of evaluate the engineering tech skills - Our tech Mentors Community design cool and real world challenges - We analyze the code and give feedback to all the candidates and as a company you get access to the code and a tech report like this--> https://bit.ly/2ZLzNKY - If you are a candidate looking for a new project just with one code challenge you can apply to multiple companies --> https://bit.ly/vetteddevs
We just launch our MVP, if you have any doubts I will be happy to answer any question.
by dualthro on 2/23/21, 8:11 PM
found from / more info here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25790355
"a system that will automatically sin up a github project with a pull-request to review, or an issue to fix. Further test-types are planned but I will launch with these two. No matter the skill level of an IC engineer, they will need to carry out effective code reviews and fix bugs. I think that the PR test will be good for senior candidates while the bug fix test will be good for junior - mid-level engineers."
by zug_zug on 2/23/21, 3:43 PM
However, afaik none of them have even broached the personality aspect, which is imo is their biggest failing and quite solvable.
Imo triplebyte/interviewing.io don't have any special objectivity, but are trying to reduce the number of interviews and barriers-to-entry.
Also none of these platforms seems to have any critical mass, or made too much progress toward a critical mass recently (afiak).
by anilgulecha on 2/23/21, 2:49 PM
by newman8r on 2/24/21, 2:45 AM
by quantumsequoia on 2/23/21, 6:45 PM
by the_arun on 2/23/21, 3:41 PM
1. Why there is no consistency for hiring?
2. Why companies have to be so different in assessing values ?
3. Why standardized leetcode kind of problems? instead focus on creativity & unconventional thinking?
etc.,
by lame88 on 2/23/21, 2:48 PM
by i0n1 on 2/23/21, 4:31 PM
by thebigspacefuck on 2/23/21, 3:13 PM
by zx321 on 2/23/21, 2:56 PM