by IamZeroBalance on 2/14/21, 6:12 AM with 208 comments
by sillysaurusx on 2/14/21, 8:24 AM
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/lj8djx/day_...
(I don't personally believe that anyone did anything that should be prosecuted here, but what I believe is irrelevant to courts.)
There is one thing that (in my un-humble, ignorant opinion) should be prosecuted: according to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RS4JIEVyXM&ab_channel=Benzi... the reason that trades were suspended is that the clearinghouse changed their requirements from 3% to 100% for GameStop specifically. And that clearinghouse settles 95% of all trades on Wall Street, so they effectively have a monopoly. Therefore that's why all the exchanges had to suspend GME training; no one had 100% collateral to cover GME for 3 days.
Everything else -- Gill getting rich, WSB posts, Citadel's bailout of Melvin, etc -- is just a distraction. I hope one day they bring that clearinghouse to heel, since it was seriously uncool for them to change the rules of the game with the justification of "we said so."
by tape_measure on 2/14/21, 8:02 AM
by mouzogu on 2/14/21, 8:59 AM
by Hnrobert42 on 2/14/21, 11:59 AM
by BLKNSLVR on 2/14/21, 8:24 AM
The article says this: "The House Financial Services Committee is examining how an apparent flood of retail trading drove GameStop and other shares to extreme highs, squeezing hedge funds like Melvin Capital that had bet against it."
Which is a sentence that answers it's own question.
The political ripples of this will be very interesting to watch.
by pjc50 on 2/14/21, 8:28 AM
> Massachusetts securities regulators have also issued a subpoena seeking Gill’s testimony.
by stereolambda on 2/14/21, 9:36 AM
I don't know if all this was completely sincere on RoaringKitty's part. Personally I believe that he mostly was at that time. Possibly he got carried away by money and fame later. But I 1) don't have to decide it for any official body 2) was never long GME, it was already too expensive (risky) compared to fundamentals when I learned of the story. What I'm trying to say is: fraudsters tend to want to sell you something, and at least it seemed that you weren't sold anything by RK.
I can get recommendations on in-depth (practical), interesting, non-pushy financial content for casual viewer. Please don't say Matt Levine, he's a (great) commentator not a practitioner.
Also, I think everyone interested is aware that no one should expect money from active investing, you should use something like index funds first while already having a comfortable amount of money in safer assets etc. That's why I say casually.
by codecamper on 2/14/21, 3:16 PM
There are piles of rules around trading in accounts < $25,000.
But then those same guys are allowed to trade options.
An option has a 100x built in leverage.
A simple solution to this problem is to require the underlying amount of margin or cash in the account to purchase the option. ie. If you want to buy a $3 option for BBBY (costing $300) then this will take $2800 from your initial cash or margin.
Yes, this effectively puts options out of reach to small investors, but... maybe that's a good thing.
by nbar on 2/14/21, 8:13 AM
by emteycz on 2/14/21, 8:18 AM
by dehrmann on 2/14/21, 8:12 AM
by puranjay on 2/14/21, 9:04 AM
This is not the free market proponents platform I used to know.
by yakaccount4 on 2/14/21, 8:07 AM
by runawaybottle on 2/14/21, 8:09 AM
by jb775 on 2/14/21, 8:06 AM
by KDJohnBrown on 2/14/21, 9:09 AM
by ajsharp on 2/14/21, 8:37 AM
Nothing else matters.