by einarvollset on 2/10/21, 6:25 PM with 44 comments
by limedaring on 2/10/21, 7:34 PM
by shoo on 2/10/21, 8:03 PM
Naively it'd be great to have data of the form "given our idea for a business was bad specifically because there would be insufficient market demand, when we validated the idea by method A (e.g. getting verbal commitment from n potential customers), validation result indicated there was enough market demand to proceed, we decided to proceed, but the business failed later specifically for a reason that the validation approach was intended to measure (customers willing to buy the service) and not for some other reason". I.e. known ground-truth, measurement, measurement result, decision to proceed or abort based on measurement result, actual outcome.
Probably would be a very tricky thing to isolate the effectiveness of the validation approach and tease it apart from other confounding factors.
by davidw on 2/10/21, 11:04 PM
by kirktrue on 2/10/21, 7:54 PM
Over half of the product ideas (~57%) came from experiencing a problem/issue firsthand.
The percentage tips to ~90% if you also include experiencing a problem/issue secondhand (through friends, clients, customers, etc.).
A measly 8% came from research alone.
by bandrade on 2/10/21, 7:41 PM
by polote on 2/10/21, 8:06 PM
- What is a MRR Growth in dollars ? Thats not how we compute growth
- Is that data statistically significant ? there 2% of companies which had 4+ more founders and still you try to make a correlation between growth and founders count.
- There is 66% of companies who have employees but only 66% of founders who work more than 30 hours a week ? That doesn't seem right...
I like the initiative, but we need more clarity to really be able to trust the data from this report
by tematema555 on 2/10/21, 11:35 PM
If you build it well, it'll probably be alive for a long time. (low daily expenses needed)
by itsdrewmiller on 2/10/21, 11:20 PM