by shartshooter on 12/25/20, 10:13 PM with 69 comments
by tima101 on 12/26/20, 5:54 AM
It's good that salmon can come into this area but smelter from Trail, BC has been polluting upper Columbia river for about hundred years. With chemicals and smelter sludge. Fish is not edible, sand is black from sludge.
Salmon may have reached upper Columbia river, but water in that part of the river is heavily polluted.
And south of Coulee Dam, there is storage of nuclear waste, just north of Richmond, WA - Hanford site. Nuclear waste already leaks into Columbia river, north of Tri-Cities area.
So in my opinion, human created disasters in the Columbia river, rank in this order: nuclear waste at Hanford site > smelter at Trail, BC > Dams without passage for fish.
Sorry for typos, typing from phone.
by evmar on 12/25/20, 11:48 PM
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21298472 , definitely worth a read if you care about salmon
by killjoywashere on 12/26/20, 12:06 AM
https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/mf...
by merb on 12/26/20, 1:08 AM
by waynecochran on 12/25/20, 11:56 PM
Dams provide so many good things (clean energy, passable water, flood protection, ...). If the salmon can spawn that would be ideal!
by ed25519FUUU on 12/26/20, 12:41 AM
by locusofself on 12/26/20, 4:16 AM
by ficklepickle on 12/25/20, 11:43 PM
Even if the spawn make it through the dams, they won't be able to come back when they reach spawning age.
They need to invest tons of money in salmon ladders and naturalization, for example, like we are doing in BC. That would be quite the project for the Grand Coulee dam, as I remember it being quite large.
Hopefully this is the first step in the massive commitment that will be needed to restore the salmon population there. The salmon run is such an important part of the ecosystem.
by jjhawk on 12/26/20, 3:09 AM
by macinjosh on 12/26/20, 4:34 AM