by karimford on 12/10/20, 8:02 AM with 102 comments
by _jgdh on 12/10/20, 8:53 AM
Speaking of which, this is also probably why the BLM movement gained widespread support. Statistics showing unequal policing have existed for a long time, but they are easy to ignore. Any person who watched the 8:46 video of a man being suffocated couldn’t ignore it.
We like to think we’re data driven, but we’re actually emotionally and visually driven. Statistics should convince people, but it doesn’t. A video of towers falling or a man being suffocated are much more likely to change people’s minds.
by tedk-42 on 12/10/20, 9:10 AM
From the president down to the people, there's a fundamental problem in the US society in how people view this as a 'non-issue'
by roenxi on 12/10/20, 8:49 AM
This seems to me to be trying to make coronavirus into an emotional threat, which I'm sure is arguably a good idea. But this comparison is, fundamentally, nonsensical. 9-11 is not a good measure of deaths. The damage 9-11 did was never the number of deaths, it was the symbolism and the hysterical response that caused the real losses of life, liberty and prosperity.
by TaylorAlexander on 12/10/20, 8:54 AM
And actually I learned recently that in 1988 George HW Bush gave this passionate speech about how the USA needed to fight climate change head on... but by the time republicans got the presidency again the party sided with oil companies on a pro fossil fuel message.
Why do we politicize science like this? Or is it inherently political? Is it just that lobbyists influence political parties differently and so issues that have nothing to do with Democrat or Republican end up getting attached to those identities?
I don’t really know what the answer is. But I do think if the USA had all taken the science seriously and did not politicize the issue we’d have at least 100,000 more Americans alive today.
by supernova87a on 12/10/20, 9:51 AM
-- Diffuse vs. concentrated in who is affected
-- Slow and steady vs. acute and sudden
-- Apparently familiar / understood vs. unknown / frightening
Maybe this is just our vulnerability as a species, and takes inordinate amount of effort to fight against.
Confronting climate change falls into the same category of course.
by ageofwant on 12/10/20, 9:10 AM
My American model of capability and competence turned out to be horseshit. I had a view of Americans as brash, somewhat obnoxious but generally genial, certainly industrious. The incredulous, self-centered and fundamentally deluded zeitgeist that seems to define current American society was a surprise to me. I think many people were sensing the decline of American society, certainly Americans, and MAGA perversely tapped into that.
America's decline is already affecting Australians with China signalling its disapproval of Australia's current 'republican' rhetoric with the current trade war. I suspect this year was a turning point for geopolitics and it won't favor western style democracies, not as what used to be the ultimate model of those turned out to be the way it has.
by jhanschoo on 12/10/20, 10:03 AM
US COVID deaths per capita ~~ytd~~ yesterday: 0.0009%
SK COVID deaths per capita: 0.001%
NZ COVID deaths per capita: 0.0005%
SG COVID deaths per capita: 0.0005%
TW COVID deaths per capita: 0.00002%
by robert_foss on 12/10/20, 9:46 AM
by oxplot on 12/10/20, 12:48 PM
by BestCatalonia on 12/10/20, 9:08 AM
by CryptoPunk on 12/10/20, 2:28 PM
by sto_hristo on 12/10/20, 9:14 AM
You can do a better job comparing apples and oranges as they do correlate on the basis of nutrition value.
Modern media is just... pathetic.