by rbrtl on 11/30/20, 6:16 PM with 17 comments
HN commentary and commenters are biased in favour of Apple.
Only Apple has defenders in the community who counterclaim against negative assertions.
While I argue that this isn’t true, based on my (biased) opinion and minimal experience, I would like to know if others have experienced the same claim, wish to present evidence to back that claim, or could present a different take on the situation.
In responding to the original claim, I went rooting through posts on major tech companies looking for those favouring other giants, and I found some. Then I was reminded that I was looking for people speaking up in favour, to oppose detractors, and again I found evidence.
The search caused me to ask: can we prove, or disprove, that HN has a specific Apple bias? Whether it's positive or negative, whether it's stronger than bias around other tech companies?
by Spooky23 on 11/30/20, 7:24 PM
Nobody gives a hoot about Dell, Lenovo, HP, etc because they are just commodity providers. People do very much care about Microsoft, but they do so on different horizontal layers — finance guys love Excel, IT guys love AD, developers love Visual Studio. But... there is no shared experience.
I think bias is the wrong characterization. End of the day, Apple is very good at communicating their position on things, and they do it across their portfolio. My nine year old son is somehow excited about the M1 chip. Some of the stuff that sounds like bias is really a reflection of people actually knowing what the company is doing.
Other than niche companies like Ferrari, I can’t think of anyone better at marketing and communications than Apple.
by matt_s on 12/1/20, 2:19 PM
Apple is a company that uses emotion when describing their products. I think this tends to bring out stronger opinions than a tech company like Google. People's perception of companies isn't going to be rational.
What is your end goal with proving/disproving a bias regarding Apple on HN?
I think what is more interesting is exploring the root cause for some of these biases - sometimes there is history of a person strongly disliking Microsoft so their perception of Apple is based in that. Sometimes someone really dislikes closed source/eco-system and prefers open-ness and tinker-ability.
by sigmaprimus on 11/30/20, 7:14 PM
The scary thought is could the whole for or against argument be created or atleast promoted by Apple itself in order to be the topic of conversation? I seem to recall a successful add campaign by Apple that did just that a long time ago. "I'm a Mac, I'm a PC"
by the_only_law on 11/30/20, 7:12 PM
by dnh44 on 11/30/20, 7:57 PM
by st1x7 on 11/30/20, 8:16 PM
How are you going to tell apart bias in favour of Apple and just being in favour of Apple?
Maybe it's easier to prove in some of the positive cases if you notice that people are making demonstrably incorrect favorable statements. But I doubt that you can reliably prove that bias doesn't exist.
by cblconfederate on 11/30/20, 9:46 PM
They also still uphold their founder's cult of personality
by qppo on 12/1/20, 1:31 AM
A lot of negative comments come from people who don't or won't buy Apple products. Which is fine, because there are a lot of positive comments from people that only own Apple devices. There's bullshit everywhere and it helps to know what it smells like.
by kristianp on 12/1/20, 2:56 AM