by nish1500 on 11/29/20, 10:10 PM with 250 comments
by dvt on 11/29/20, 11:06 PM
It also makes things harder for those of us that don't want to run Ponzi schemes: How does one break out when everyone's taking glamorous selfies in Thailand but I'm working in a dingy apartment trying to build the next big app?
It's a tough situation on all sides with no obvious solutions.
by marcus_holmes on 11/29/20, 11:06 PM
Sprinkled with some truly fascinating folks who genuinely discovered some new and interesting way of making this work for them.
by dx87 on 11/29/20, 11:25 PM
by ZephyrBlu on 11/30/20, 2:19 AM
1) Try to start an online business. It doesn't really matter what you're doing or if it succeeds as long as it's marketable to people aspiring to create an online business
2) Make a big fuss about the launch on all social platforms (Twitter, HN, PH, IH, your blog, etc) and hope someone with a big audience signal boosts you or you get lucky
3a) If you start making money, awesome! Constantly post revenue numbers, things about Building in Public (TM) and "you can do it too!". Your audience (And therefore revenue) will compound exponentially
3b) If you 'fail', make a blog post retrospective called "Lessons Learned" and blast that out everywhere as well
4) Repeat steps 1-3 until you hit 3a. Throw in a few "6 Months of Building in Public" type posts if you're really having trouble
In reality, I strongly believe that very few people end up making it through this type of process and success mostly comes down to luck or connections (Anyone who already has an audience can easily pull you up).
by renewiltord on 11/30/20, 12:06 AM
Tech people don't fall into these Ponzi schemes. They fall into a different variety where a serial entrepreneur who has repeatedly received funding is assumed to be more capable than a guy new to the game.
by throwaway0a5e on 11/30/20, 4:20 AM
This should gets it's own article. So many products and services totally unremarkable but survive simply because they've managed to peddle a brand image whereby it is fashionable to talk them up and unfashionable to say "I blew a bunch of money on them and the results were crap".
by solresol on 11/30/20, 5:41 AM
by 04148565 on 11/30/20, 12:32 AM
by giantg2 on 11/30/20, 12:28 AM
by m3nu on 11/29/20, 11:15 PM
Even if person X is successful and writes down every step, it will be very hard for anyone to repeat it.
by DVassallo on 11/30/20, 3:18 AM
If you want to see how I make it all work, check out my interview on Indie Hackers: https://www.indiehackers.com/podcast/177-daniel-vassallo
by aerovistae on 11/29/20, 11:02 PM
by maeln on 11/30/20, 8:56 AM
by jasonkester on 11/30/20, 7:07 AM
Imagine, for example, that you had stumbled across a Magic Formula to create a niche Software as a Service business that brings in $5,000/month while only taking up 10 hours of your time each week. Why would you give that formula away when you could just use it yourself over and over and become a zillionaire?
Well, let's think about it. Assuming you do have that Magic Formula and have used it once, what are your options?
1. Go live on the beach in Thailand. Forever.
2. Build another business that brings in $5,000/month for 10hrs/week effort.
Notice that each spin of the Magic Formula cuts another 10 hours/week out of your schedule of growing your hair and hanging out with that blonde girl from the article. Spin it 4 times and you're back to having a full time job like the rest of the world.
So you don't do that. You hang out on the beach, wondering why more people don't do what you're doing. And you from time to time try to nudge a few more people into doing so themselves.
At least that's my take on it, having spun that formula twice.
by cranium on 11/30/20, 7:43 AM
by ggm on 11/29/20, 11:52 PM
Sucker being the operative word.
(also, its satire, the real denouement is his last guidance: "make things of value, don't seek money, seek problems of high value to solve")
by 29athrowaway on 11/29/20, 11:08 PM
"How to double your money gambling everything on a coin toss"
Sure, you can win a coin toss, but unless you can reproduce that experiment consistently it's not a viable advice.
And that pretty much to everything... if a process is not better than random chance then it's worthless.
by psanford on 11/29/20, 11:03 PM
by tauwauwau on 11/30/20, 12:40 AM
by noobermin on 11/30/20, 4:33 AM
by paxys on 11/30/20, 3:19 AM
by brauhaus on 11/30/20, 5:20 PM
by ForHackernews on 11/29/20, 11:26 PM
by l1am0 on 11/30/20, 12:52 PM
by Simulacra on 11/29/20, 10:57 PM
by heintzsight on 12/4/20, 2:07 PM
I do admire the hustle and ingenuity, but what is ambition but a form of love and hope? The entire article had a meticulously cynical view on business and his customers. I think the idea of responsibility is shocking to the author, who obviously has never experienced something meaningful. He's a fraud and he knows it.
Humans find meaning by helping other humans. The article is perverse and I really wish the author go back to wherever trash hole he came from. The western world does not need this kind of parasitic thinking.
by fxtentacle on 11/29/20, 11:08 PM
That said, don't all the cool kids call it "Mastermind" these days?
by nickhodge on 11/30/20, 1:01 AM
Step 1. Invent Bitcoin.
by asimjalis on 11/29/20, 11:56 PM
by louwrentius on 11/30/20, 1:08 AM
Cool article though.
by bleepblorp on 11/30/20, 1:05 AM
Because the cryptocurrency ecosystem does not do investment -- likely in very large part because no one can buy anything legal with cryptocurrency -- returns for coiners who cash out must, by definition, come from later investments.
Paying earlier investors with the investments of those who follow is the definition of a ponzi scheme.
by spamizbad on 11/30/20, 12:24 AM
by blackd0g on 11/30/20, 8:44 PM
by monkzero on 11/30/20, 2:02 PM
by woahAcademia on 11/29/20, 11:23 PM
They make lots of money, they must be smart right? So when a friend disagrees the person doesn't consider it.
And unlike their Engineering counterparts they won't search for proof. If you need to see real world examples, look at who buys brand name. It's telling.