by x43b on 9/1/20, 1:31 PM with 473 comments
by peeters on 9/1/20, 3:08 PM
Unfortunately their web player is not linkable, but this is the KLAX North/South Final Approach feed (https://www.liveatc.net/archive.php?m=klax6) from Aug 31, 0130-0200 UTC.
by sandworm101 on 9/1/20, 2:13 PM
No. Yves "Jetman" Rossi's design can now launch from a standing position on the ground. It is able to launch, hover, transition to forward flight and zoom-climb to several thousand feet. Other than the landing, which is currently still via parachute ... ironman.
by Johnny555 on 9/1/20, 3:25 PM
It wouldn't be hard to maneuver it right in front of the airliner and cause a collision. While the aircraft would likely survive an engine strike, at only a few thousand feet of altitude it doesn't give much time to recover.
by elteto on 9/1/20, 2:23 PM
“Tower, there’s a guy in a jetpack flying outside.”
“Copy. To your left or your right?”
by princekolt on 9/1/20, 2:24 PM
With that being said, if it zipped by the plane very quickly, there's the possibility it was maybe a very large RC plane shaped like a guy in a jetpack, which I think could be a bit more plausible.
by callumprentice on 9/1/20, 2:24 PM
by throwaway9870 on 9/1/20, 3:35 PM
by mdorazio on 9/1/20, 2:16 PM
by ohples on 9/1/20, 3:52 PM
by bgun on 9/1/20, 2:22 PM
by peter303 on 9/2/20, 4:17 AM
https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/4/20753648/jet-powered-hover...
by anotheryou on 9/1/20, 5:24 PM
At least mostly foam board.
by snarfy on 9/1/20, 2:23 PM
by ggm on 9/2/20, 7:06 AM
We've had these consequences for some time, in other ways which really aren't that different. You can buy materiel on the open market and devices like drones without gps lockouts, or I guess flying suits.
El-Al has been flying at a higher risk profile than others for some time. So has cargo in the "stans" and the middle east and Africa. I'm not saying "shoot him down" is the best choice but there surely exist a range of choices here up to and including defensive action?
Commercial ships can request rights to armed force on deck in the pirate zones. Lethal force. We lock the guns up otherwise but the reasons the Gatling guns are fitted (if that's what they are) are understood. Aircraft can have anti missile systems. We've had that for years.
I think the ways we will deal with this will be broadly similar - perimeter defences, on aircraft detection systems, IFF and boots on the ground.
We probably don't have a systemic risk profile change here beyond the breakdown in the social contract: its funny to play but things work better when grown-ups don't do some things. Maybe 2nd amendment rights to a flying suit as a weapon is a thing?
WINGMAN FUNNY NOT FUNNY
by nimbius on 9/1/20, 5:32 PM
by lawlessone on 9/1/20, 2:29 PM
Not sure they go high enough though.
by ethbr0 on 9/1/20, 2:16 PM
by mannykannot on 9/2/20, 1:50 AM
by sizzle on 9/2/20, 7:50 AM
by LinuxBender on 9/1/20, 8:19 PM
by yalogin on 9/1/20, 4:37 PM
by dreamcompiler on 9/1/20, 2:55 PM
by wonderwonder on 9/2/20, 3:48 AM
by grumblepeet on 9/1/20, 2:43 PM
by shadowgovt on 9/1/20, 3:49 PM
Serious allegations if true!
by dghughes on 9/1/20, 2:29 PM
by krm01 on 9/1/20, 8:27 PM
by prtkgpt on 9/3/20, 12:32 PM
by sahoo on 9/2/20, 11:53 AM
by TazeTSchnitzel on 9/1/20, 4:01 PM
by tus88 on 9/2/20, 1:38 AM
by zw123456 on 9/1/20, 2:02 PM
by Animats on 9/1/20, 5:47 PM
by cronix on 9/2/20, 3:56 AM
by nestlequ1k on 9/1/20, 3:50 PM
by topkai22 on 9/1/20, 3:23 PM
by markstos on 9/1/20, 11:54 PM
by josephpmay on 9/1/20, 2:17 PM
by hourislate on 9/1/20, 2:06 PM
by tibbydudeza on 9/1/20, 9:17 PM
by IgorPartola on 9/1/20, 2:10 PM
by AS126 on 9/1/20, 4:09 PM
by SeanFerree on 9/1/20, 7:36 PM
by peterkelly on 9/1/20, 3:09 PM
by dhosek on 9/1/20, 2:58 PM
by 2rsf on 9/1/20, 1:38 PM
by tezza on 9/1/20, 5:01 PM
by tiku on 9/1/20, 2:47 PM
by mas3god on 9/1/20, 2:17 PM
by ck2 on 9/1/20, 2:33 PM
by jansan on 9/1/20, 2:29 PM
"Look! Is it a stockbroker? Is it a quantity surveyor? Is it a church warden? NO! It's Bicycle Repair Man!"
by degenerate on 9/1/20, 2:45 PM
edit: Nevermind, I thought the embedded youtube videos in the article was footage of the event described in the article. I didn't realize the video footage was a separate flight from 2015.