by tchalla on 6/25/20, 9:26 AM with 159 comments
by simonkafan on 6/25/20, 12:44 PM
What makes it even worse, in case of wirecard, their auditor EY had audited and certified wirecard's balance sheet for years with no objection. They were satisfied with a clumsy fake audit certificate for 2 billion euros in a Philippine account! For how many companies EY did the same? How superficially do they check their customers?
by adwf on 6/25/20, 10:49 AM
Worked for a fintech company a few years back that used Wirecard as the processor for one of their products. Somehow they managed to lose the PK/FK relationship between accounts and transactions (or something like that). A whole lot of our customers suddenly started getting other people's transactions on their accounts. It was the final straw that shutdown the entire product line and we moved on to other providers for new projects.
So, not at all surprised they don't know where their money is.
by cs702 on 6/25/20, 1:37 PM
I keep imagining a Monty Python-esque skit:
"Was it stolen? We don't know."
"Was it spent? We don't know."
"Was it lent? We don't know."
"Was it transferred? We don't know."
"Was it burned? We don't know."
Coincidentally, or maybe not, the company's last fictitious balance sheet, which was published in November of last year, right before the scandal was revealed, reports approximately $2B in long-term debt.[a]
So, as much as Wirecard was in the business of processing financial transactions ($124B last year!), it was also secretly performing a magic act of borrowing money and making it disappear into thin air. In a way, it's been an "impressive" performance.
On a more serious note, I hope Wirecard's failure is not seen in hindsight as a "Creditanstalt moment."[b]
--
[a] https://ir.wirecard.com/download/companies/wirecard/Presenta...
[b] The failure of Creditanstalt, an Austrian bank, in 1931, marks the beginning of the Great Depression in Europe: https://www.bis.org/publ/work333.pdf
by dang on 6/25/20, 7:41 PM
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23611347
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23573386
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23598824
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23438323
This, from a year ago, reads interestingly now: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19737344
by jdblair on 6/25/20, 11:00 AM
by physicsguy on 6/25/20, 1:11 PM
by fbn79 on 6/25/20, 10:47 AM
by ivanche on 6/25/20, 11:17 AM
by GrumpyNl on 6/25/20, 2:44 PM
by sixhobbits on 6/25/20, 10:17 AM
by the_mitsuhiko on 6/25/20, 10:00 AM
by lazylizard on 6/25/20, 12:43 PM
by TekMol on 6/25/20, 11:01 AM
Trade on shares in the
company was suspended
What does this mean? Is a certain stock exchange not executing trades anymore? Are all exchanges worldwide in sync not executing trades? If so, how is the sync achieved?If it only was suspended at the Frankfurt stock exchange which is mentioned in the article, it would be interesting to see how it is doing at other exchanges.
Google is still showing realtime Frankfurt prices. Currently at a market cap of about €350M.
And what is the reason behind that? Is it guaranteed that shares of a company that files for insolvency are worth 0? And therefore the exchanges want to save uninformed investors from buying them?