by holtwick on 6/15/20, 4:34 AM with 51 comments
by cryo on 6/15/20, 7:50 AM
Since in WebRTC peers connect directly to each other they'll see the IP of the other peer and can determine their locations.
Further there is the signalling server which may also see these connection details if it isn't end to end encrypted (I haven't checked the code).
IMHO private might be a better word than anonymous here.
by Andrew_nenakhov on 6/15/20, 6:26 PM
End to end encryption implies that you have established an encrypted connection with a known participant and secured it by verifying your keys either off-band or via some CA provider to prevent MitM attack.
If your chat partner is anonymous, and your only connection is via offered service, there is no way to determine if you are being spoofed.
So anonymous end-to-end encryption is an oxymoron. I wish people would drop this e2ee fetish, insisting it everywhere, and would learn how it works, so they would be using the real thing where it makes sense, instead of opting for readily supplied snake oil.
by schoen on 6/15/20, 5:31 AM
by seesawtron on 6/15/20, 2:02 PM
by Angostura on 6/15/20, 1:22 PM
by tpetry on 6/15/20, 7:44 AM
by totetsu on 6/15/20, 5:12 AM
The website that provides the web app and mediates the communication stores as (few -> little) data as possible
by sci_prog on 6/15/20, 6:40 PM
by waynenilsen on 6/15/20, 12:48 PM
by nannal on 6/15/20, 12:17 PM
Using firefox 79, the usual prompts to allow permissions were not issued.