by yakshaving on 5/20/20, 10:18 PM with 54 comments
by gk1 on 5/20/20, 11:02 PM
If you want to go a step further and see which traffic sources lead to form completions (like newsletter or app signups), I made a utility that captures UTM parameters and then inserts them into any form submitted during that session: https://github.com/gkogan/sup-save-url-parameters
by _jal on 5/21/20, 1:04 AM
by petercooper on 5/20/20, 10:50 PM
In the last five years it hasn't come up at all as everyone is doing it and people seem to dig through their analytics less than ever before, but if it helps you track links to your own content, as being shown in the article, it's certainly worth a go.
Another amusing point is that HN didn't used to strip these parameters, so sometimes I could see when people had reposted things from our newsletters on to HN (and kept the utm params in) which was always a buzz :-)
by monadic2 on 5/20/20, 11:42 PM
I have never observed a “utm” query param actually improve the quality of the response.
We all know why this obviously positive functionality isn’t built into the browser: because browser vendors rely on hostile business practices to survive. Still no technology to transact with the site you’re visiting for their content....
by hbcondo714 on 5/21/20, 4:02 AM
by anigbrowl on 5/21/20, 2:10 AM
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/neat-url/jchobbjgi...
by zamalek on 5/21/20, 4:14 AM
This garbage breaks the UX of the internet.