by zaggynl on 5/18/20, 3:04 PM with 1177 comments
by dang on 5/18/20, 9:11 PM
by koheripbal on 5/18/20, 3:39 PM
The Founding Fathers could not have predicted this.
Google's "We're a private company" get-out-jail-free card cannot continue to apply.
by gabaix on 5/18/20, 3:31 PM
- if they don't take down speech some consider hateful
- if they take down speech some do not consider hateful
共匪 is seen as an insult by a group, but others do not. If Youtube bans nothing, then hate speech thrives and they get bad PR. If Youtube bans anything anyone flags as hate speech, then they become de facto as censorship agents for foreign powers. Anything critical can be seen as offensive and taken down by CCP or Russia.
Youtube is more and more siding towards removing content. I wonder, can US regulators do something about it?
by socrates1998 on 5/18/20, 4:05 PM
The CCP holds values that are completely untenable to western values. As time goes on, companies who don't know this will lose massive brand value in the western world.
The NBA has managed to tight rope this so far, but I doubt they can hold it together for very much longer. The CCP is still calling for the Houston Rockets GM to be fired 10 months after he tweeted vague support for the Hong Kong Democracy movement. They still refuse to show NBA games domestically because of it.
One vague tweet in support of democracy.
by humaid on 5/18/20, 3:31 PM
by mikaeluman on 5/18/20, 3:30 PM
We in the IT community need to disassociate with google as much as we possibly can.
Free speech is more important than ever.
by jimbob45 on 5/18/20, 4:15 PM
by JumpCrisscross on 5/18/20, 3:24 PM
Can one take out an ad with "共匪" in the text? Adwords against it? Is this censored on Orkut? Would Google consider censoring Gmail? Or Google Voice? Would they consider bleeping Google Meets?
Google will need to be very public about who signed off on this and under what framework.
by zaggynl on 5/18/20, 3:04 PM
by barbegal on 5/18/20, 3:42 PM
A product manager in China asks: can we find a way to prevent people commenting on these videos with comments that contain the word 共匪. Engineer goes away and comes up with a plan to train an AI model to detect these comments. He present's this solution to his manager who informs him that the solution needs to be in place next week, there is no time to gather the required training data and annotate it. There is also no budget for this project.
So the engineer goes off to find a new plan and finds that Google already has a basic spam comment detector which uses simple heuristics to delete comments. He adds a new rule to the detector. Mark as spam if it contains the "共匪" sub-string.
His boss is now happy, it gets sent to a test team in China who confirm that commenting with the word 共匪 on one of the videos results in the comment being deleted. Test passed job done, ticket closed. At no point does this get escalated or reviewed by anyone properly.
And if you don't believe this can happen anywhere, see the Scunthorpe problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe_problem
by nunodonato on 5/18/20, 3:16 PM
by exo-pla-net on 5/18/20, 4:19 PM
They would target anything that gets spammed and reduces the quality of discourse (such as it is on YouTube).
I see no evidence that China is getting any special treatment here. It was the subject of hateful spam, so now it gets a filter. Same would apply to any other country or topic.
From my perspective, the absolutist "freedom of speech"/anti-censorship belief is naive. There would be no havens for intelligent communication online without censorship.
When an intelligent, well-reasoned critique is deliberately suppressed, protest is warranted.
Until then, it's shrill and spammy and divisive and ascribes nefarious intent to people simply trying to keep the room clean and is, ironically, best moderated away to preserve the quality of discourse elsewhere.
by MangoCoffee on 5/18/20, 3:30 PM
a free, open and democratic China is Taiwan. you can see it by Taiwan's handling of covid 19. they are open about their cases, allowed press to ask unlimited questions and show everything to Taiwanese and not conceal any info.
its sad that Western companies love money more than the Western values that they always talk about. "Don't be evil"
by AdmiralAsshat on 5/18/20, 3:26 PM
by myartsev on 5/18/20, 3:21 PM
by sacks2k on 5/18/20, 3:33 PM
I've noticed, especially recently, that most websites that allow commenting will shadow ban comments they disagree with, even if it's not trolling or abusive.
The scary part is that most people don't even see this and just assume that all of the comments they see are the only ones on the site. This can create the false sense that a larger number of people have a particular viewpoint.
This sort of censorship and controlling behavior absolutely effects the outcome of our elections and is much worse than anything Russia can even dream of.
The Chinese government knows this well and in addition to online troll campaigns, they fund our media companies directly and will pull funding if these companies don't toe the line.
With Covid ripping through the profits of many of these media companies, now is the time they will buy them up in mass.
We all should be prepared for an online future of CCP controlled media and influence.
by tru3_power on 5/18/20, 5:06 PM
by zozin on 5/18/20, 3:24 PM
by kevin_thibedeau on 5/18/20, 4:12 PM
by self_awareness on 5/18/20, 3:18 PM
by dirtydroog on 5/18/20, 5:38 PM
YouTube is a platform designed around showing video ads to targeted audiences. In order to show those ads they need to allow people to upload user generated content. This content needs to be 'brand safe', i.e. it cannot be content that advertisers don't want to be associated with.
'Content' is more than just the video itself, comments are part of this.
If an Easily Offended Entity, in this instance 'China', sees an ad from AdvertiserX appearing on content they deem offensive they can kick up a stink about this, this is especially true in China where nationalism is extremely strong. Western brands have a long history of apologising to China over minor things, they really cannot risk fervent nationalism from damaging their balance sheet either through boycotts or having authorities turning a blind eye to counterfeiting.
So YouTube will remove this content, not because they're under the thumb of China, but because advertisers call the shots.
by zanethomas on 5/18/20, 4:56 PM
by mmhsieh on 5/18/20, 3:28 PM
by haram_masala on 5/18/20, 3:29 PM
by kauffj on 5/18/20, 4:09 PM
We are working hard to design systems that have the same user experience as the traditional web, but fundamentally redesigned so that this kind of behavior is outright impossible. LBRY allows for local control of the publishing experience, and layers identity, discovery, and payments on top of a distributed data network.
P2P desktop client: https://lbry.com/get
Web-version: https://lbry.tv
Tech documentation: https://lbry.tech
Almost 100 people contributed to LBRY last month, and more than 2 million people used it.
Come join us, and escape YouTube :)
by russli1993 on 5/18/20, 4:11 PM
by root_axis on 5/18/20, 5:23 PM
by leoh on 5/18/20, 5:45 PM
by f0ok on 5/18/20, 5:42 PM
Does anyone know about other censored phrases or expressions?
On a completely different note, wouldn't it be possible to create a free (as in freedom), open-source, decentralized search engine?
by cwperkins on 5/18/20, 5:57 PM
I bring this up in relation to free speech because it seems to me like there was no outlet for the residents to speak up on what was happening. It looks like there was a chilling effect and some discussions may just not have been had. I think its important to provide that forum to air grievances so that a chilling effect does not occur and people feel like they are a frog slowly being boiled alive.
I don't think Democracy is the model for all nations today, but I do think that as countries develop and have a certain educated populace that they will trend in that direction. Its better to be enfranchised, then completely trust the decisions made on your behalf elected by a group of technocrats but it requires a populace voting in good faith and of a certain education attainment overall.
We must keep an open dialog and forum for people to speak freely. I like to think of confronting prejudice as a first responder running towards danger. I don't cower from having those conversations, I'd much prefer to deconstruct them. I have to say though that the internet makes that hard since it is easy to find echo chambers.
I really want to see communities like r/politics on Reddit better try to foster rich, insightful discourse because I really don't see it that way now and if someone feels differently, I would love to hear from you.
I personally think Reddit should create a new "Featured Comments" feature like they have in comments on NYT and appoint mods of different biases to choose Featured Comments on highly upvoted content. In the US House of Representatives they give members of the house equal time to address the floor and should we try to virtually recreate that type of forum as well?
by throwaway17_17 on 5/18/20, 6:29 PM
by jshevek on 5/18/20, 3:29 PM
https://en.greatfire.org/blog/2012/jun/all-blocked-keywords-...
by dkdk8283 on 5/18/20, 3:18 PM
by djdjrjebfbfjd on 5/18/20, 7:26 PM
by jpxw on 5/18/20, 3:54 PM
by 1cvmask on 5/18/20, 4:00 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/12/us/politics/youtube-terro...
by really3452 on 5/18/20, 3:37 PM
by AmazingTurtle on 5/18/20, 4:17 PM
See, they pulled a sneaky on ya
by alewi481 on 5/18/20, 3:30 PM
by yingliu4203 on 5/18/20, 3:38 PM
by nromiun on 5/18/20, 4:40 PM
by leephillips on 5/18/20, 6:09 PM
by est on 5/18/20, 3:40 PM
by arduanika on 5/18/20, 5:38 PM
by sergiotapia on 5/18/20, 4:40 PM
by xhruso00 on 5/18/20, 3:20 PM
by peter_retief on 5/18/20, 4:48 PM
by torrance on 5/18/20, 3:26 PM
by fareesh on 5/18/20, 8:39 PM
1) You must be signed in to view "controversial" comments
2) When you sign up you are given a "Safe search" style set of options for what kind of comment moderation you want (Safe, Moderate, None).
3) For users who want no moderation, apply US law or whichever law applies. For everyone else, apply the existing censorship.
by gonational on 5/18/20, 5:04 PM
I think we need to band together against censorship in general, not only when it’s related to China.
by anigbrowl on 5/18/20, 5:52 PM
by ixxi on 5/18/20, 3:56 PM
Is any anti-CCP content banned/blocked? epochtimes? falungong? ... it's all still there.
by geuis on 5/18/20, 5:34 PM
by dionian on 5/18/20, 3:11 PM
EDIT: Please don't downvote me for contributing relevant facts to the discussion. I do not support censorship.
by asah on 5/18/20, 3:33 PM
(former mod for a top subreddit)
by ickwabe on 5/18/20, 7:28 PM
I'm confused as to why people would think youtube is bothering to sensor those two characters in oparticular as opposed to something much more likely like spam/bot filtering or channel word filtering. I'd think the Chinese Gov would be much more animated about videos like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9AvUuEPgvA
or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=S3RzKKfNkTk
or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4TReo_G74A
or any of millions of other videos.
i can find plenty of negative comments directed at the chinese communist party in comments all over youtube.
by lifeisstillgood on 5/18/20, 3:29 PM
by vuln on 5/18/20, 11:24 PM
by lern_too_spel on 5/18/20, 4:34 PM
by silasdavis on 5/18/20, 3:44 PM
Profanity filter gone wrong? Meh.
by beshrkayali on 5/18/20, 3:42 PM
by donatj on 5/18/20, 9:39 PM
by abandonliberty on 5/18/20, 4:56 PM
Does Google even have any sort of significant oversight?
by broabprobe on 5/18/20, 11:27 PM
by qbaqbaqba on 5/18/20, 6:33 PM
by whoevercares on 5/18/20, 5:19 PM
by wdr1 on 5/18/20, 9:38 PM
by beyondkaoru on 5/18/20, 8:08 PM
by tourist2d on 5/18/20, 3:55 PM
by Zanneth on 5/19/20, 7:27 PM
by zheli on 5/20/20, 3:17 PM
by Gollapalli on 5/18/20, 5:52 PM
by janee on 5/18/20, 7:52 PM
From my ignorant perspective I just don't understand why it would necessitate a takedown.
Is it aimed at the whole country, some subset of people, the party, communism in general??
I don't get it.
by ddevault on 5/18/20, 3:27 PM
by chenzhekl on 5/19/20, 1:32 AM
by Simulacra on 5/27/20, 2:55 PM
by octocop on 5/18/20, 7:52 PM
by hujun on 5/18/20, 3:45 PM
by rmason on 5/18/20, 4:38 PM
by missosoup on 5/18/20, 3:27 PM
It's not flagged, it just went from #13 on the front page to invisible. In a single refresh. How does that work? Looking at the votes and age, it should be in the top 5 of both Ask and the front page. What's the metric or decision that made it disappear?
@dang might be worth commenting on this? Moderation is fine, opaque removal of content with no explanation, not so much. I fully believe @dang has the best interests of the community in mind, so please give us a clear explanation of what's going on here.
by vxNsr on 5/18/20, 5:46 PM
by xster on 5/18/20, 4:33 PM
by Dahoon on 5/18/20, 8:34 PM
Yeah, most definitely a YouTube user.
by BitwiseFool on 5/18/20, 3:26 PM
by thoughtstheseus on 5/18/20, 4:59 PM
by buckminstrix on 5/18/20, 3:23 PM
You'll also get videos deleted if you include in them info against WHO advice.
by aml702 on 5/18/20, 5:15 PM
by mesozoic on 5/18/20, 9:14 PM
Does Hacker news?
by sebastianconcpt on 5/18/20, 11:23 PM
Google anti-anticommunism is not covert but overt now.
Take note kids: all forms of anticommunism are going to be pathologized and, when possible, criminalized.
by aml702 on 5/18/20, 5:16 PM
by runawaybottle on 5/18/20, 3:31 PM
by rbanffy on 5/18/20, 5:26 PM
Before I hit submit, let me add a mandatory "burn, karma, burn" because I know what I'm stepping into.
by yandrypozo on 5/18/20, 4:54 PM
> The European Parliament has condemned communism as equivalent to Nazism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prague_Declaration_on_European...
by mikaeluman on 5/18/20, 4:02 PM
by bryanrasmussen on 5/18/20, 3:51 PM
I mean obviously I believe putting the comment in youtube will get it deleted. I just don't necessarily believe it means what it says or the reasoning is because Google is pro-China.
First off, 15 seconds all the time means automatic deletion. Is this really a common enough phrase that they have automatic deletion set up for communist bandits, how about communist yak-fuckers? That sounds pretty unlikely to be set to catch that phrase, so maybe it would just be caught by an automatic sentiment/profanity analysis. How about just yak-fuckers, how about bandits? I'm not going to try all these out myself because
I don't have the linguistic expertise to know if that ideograph means communist bandits, I do have some co-workers I could ask I guess, maybe tomorrow.
Everyone is asking about the phrase in other google services, well in Google translate it translates it as Gangsters when I go to English and Italian. The second one is pretty suspicious because Gangster isn't an Italian word but that's what it gave me a couple minutes ago.
I guess I will wait until later to see how this pans out before getting my rage fully on. rage cautiously in prep stage for now.
on edit: fixed some grammar.
by sb057 on 5/18/20, 3:27 PM
Will they respond to this controversy with that then-popular xkcd strip[1] about how, "if you're yelled at, boycotted, have your show canceled, or get banned from an internet community, your free speech riots aren't being violated. It's just that the people listening think you're an asshole, and they're showing you the door."?
by baybal2 on 5/18/20, 11:11 PM
They were self-blocking gmail, their forums, blogger, etc.
Now, the 6-4 hysteria came to Youtube, now in US!
by voiddb on 5/18/20, 11:38 PM
by ecmascript on 5/18/20, 3:35 PM
by sebastianconcpt on 5/18/20, 4:58 PM
by lonelappde on 5/18/20, 3:36 PM
by alfiedotwtf on 5/18/20, 8:40 PM
I could imagine YouTube toeing the Chinese party line, but Hacker News? Really?! Is this about the Y Combinator fund not wanting to upset Chinese money?
This really leaves a bad taste in my mouth @pg