by antibland on 5/6/20, 8:14 PM with 6 comments
by makecheck on 5/8/20, 7:44 PM
There was very little wrong with the traditional “free trial then buy”, and “buy next major version” model. Also, it crucially preserved the value of software, which is much larger than a few dollars. The only “flaw” was that it’s less money for gatekeepers so the stores have refused to support traditional buying models in any sensible way, over a decade later.
As a developer, I refuse to participate in a subscription or in-app purchase model because it is never what I want as a user of software. It only makes sense for things that are constantly having major content added like TV shows.
A subscription feels like a server asking you for another tip every time you lift your fork while eating. It’s not that I “couldn’t” pay you in this way, and it’s not that I don’t think you need to make money but isn’t this method a little ridiculous?
by joshstrange on 5/7/20, 5:17 PM
by graton on 5/6/20, 8:21 PM
In one week Wink requires a $4.99/month subscription. If you don't pay it then starting 13-May-2020 you lose all access to your Wink device.
Seems a little ransom/blackmail-ey given how little time they are giving people to switch over :(
by graton on 5/6/20, 8:19 PM