by alansammarone on 4/14/20, 8:08 AM with 2 comments
by gwern on 4/15/20, 3:28 AM
Is that true? I've never heard of 'muscle memory' being an actual memory like that...
---
However, I'd like to point out that there is in fact a well-established kind of memory which lets you use a human to carry a large amount of memory while being 'clueless' about not just its meaning, but what the encoding even is: visual recognition memory.
You can recognize whether you've seen an image before; given appropriate datasets, this allows encoding messages into a human's visual recognition memory without them being able to elicit this knowledge in the absence of the target images. This can be used for tricks like storing passwords, or multiplying 10-digit numbers: https://people.csail.mit.edu/andyd/rec_method.pdf I calculate that you could feasibly store 5.8 kilobits per human: https://www.gwern.net/Spaced-repetition#fn61
by seafood on 4/15/20, 3:19 AM