by drenginian on 3/24/20, 7:56 PM with 64 comments
by kadonoishi on 3/24/20, 8:41 PM
If all payments are stopped for three months, then it’s simply hitting the “Pause” button on the whole money system. There are no economic data for that quarter. GDP is meaningless, unemployment is meaningless. That quarter is a big fat missing data point.
Three months later everyone comes out of their houses and goes back to work. Paychecks resume, rents resume, landlords resume paying their mortgages, and no one ever catches up on any payments from the missing period. Just pretend we skipped three months ahead via a sci-fi time knot.
by taleodor on 3/24/20, 8:18 PM
This only works if the government mandates full moratorium on both rents and mortgages. That also means that no interest on mortgage is accrued during this time.
Otherwise, landlords are screwed in the same way as tenants - they can't pay mortgage and the property may turn into foreclosure. More so, frequently landlords are screwed even more - because it may be hard to get rid of non-paying tenant especially during this time. So tenant may get sort of temporary free pass by just not paying rent.
Bottom line - Landlords are not the right target of this rage. Appeal to Governments, not to Landlords.
by LatteLazy on 3/24/20, 9:01 PM
by Veen on 3/24/20, 8:21 PM
Landlords have mortgages and a host of other associated costs. If this were made a policy in the UK, you'd have a huge number of small-time buy-to-let landlords going bankrupt and losing their nest-egg to the bank.
by appleiigs on 3/24/20, 9:02 PM
by ianlevesque on 3/24/20, 8:39 PM
by pouty-gazelle on 3/24/20, 8:46 PM
by vearwhershuh on 3/24/20, 8:40 PM
Then take six months to put together a comprehensive debt-forgiveness program that looks at income, family situation, etc. Forgive things like food, rent, etc. Slowly increase the interest rate cap as the economy recovers.
We need ongoing money in peoples hands now to put everyone at ease that they aren't going to be out on the streets in a week with their kids, not a piddling one-time payment in a month.
by justaguyhere on 3/24/20, 8:18 PM
Rentiers deserve no protection, especially when everyone else is bleeding
by drenginian on 3/24/20, 8:25 PM
By definition if you are wealthy enough to own property beyond one house then you’re wealthy enough to survive this.
And if you can’t afford to, then sell it and suffer like all the other real business owners are suffering.
Why should landlords be a protected species in all this?