by proxybop on 12/4/19, 8:22 PM with 118 comments
by walrus01 on 12/4/19, 9:06 PM
Sony PVMs (professional video monitors), such as used in a tv production studio have been increasing in market value. Similar tubes but with more advanced electronics.
To the best of my knowledge there are zero remaining manufacturers of CRTs in the world.
by gorgoiler on 12/4/19, 11:56 PM
These wires were needed in all Trinitron products, but the more exacting demands of high resolution (1024 lines!) meant the support wires were quite visible horizontally, especially on uniform backgrounds like a gray Windows desktop. They divided the screen into three equal areas.
Despite this apparent flaw, Trinitron still had huge market share amongst enthusiast PC owners. Maybe it was brand loyalty, or maybe they really were much better quality than any other CRT out there?
At least as I remember it, if you wanted to take (or be seen to be taking) color reproduction seriously, then you had to have a 21” Trinitron. I guess the black horizontal support wires became just as much a part of brand signaling as the RGB lozenges in the logo. Lots of people I knew had amazing Trinitron CRTs and all they did was edit Word documents!
Kind of like a Leica red dot, or the white spot on Dunhill pipes.
by outworlder on 12/4/19, 9:10 PM
by StillBored on 12/4/19, 10:31 PM
The trinitron monitors I had were running 1600x1200 or better and with a small font the convergence would give white text a purple shadow/etc. Very 1980's apple ][, which a lot of people seemed to be OK with, or maybe its just because they ran much lower resolution TV signals or much larger fonts.
by ben1040 on 12/4/19, 9:28 PM
Their flat panel TV died a couple weeks ago and they put that TV in their living room as a stopgap.
The picture tube on that TV is still so good after all this time, they now don't want to bother buying a new TV.
by 3fe9a03ccd14ca5 on 12/5/19, 4:09 AM
>Back in the day I spent an afternoon configuring my old 19" CRT like that. I ended up with settings like 800x600x167Hz, 1024x768x133Hz, 1600x1200x89Hz and 1920x1440x73Hz. Many refresh rates were much higher than the stated documentation, and I ran it for years like that.
I’m amazed at that those resolutions and refresh rates were achieved so long ago. LCDs were so thin as to ge unstoppable, but definitely came with trade offs.
by spectramax on 12/4/19, 9:01 PM
by mzs on 12/4/19, 10:17 PM
by WalterBright on 12/5/19, 12:01 AM
by gandalfian on 12/4/19, 10:15 PM
Incidentally why did europe get a last generation of widescreen CRT's but the USA basically went from humoungous 4:3 CRT's straight to wide flatscreens?
by headsupftw on 12/4/19, 10:15 PM
by WalterBright on 12/5/19, 12:33 AM
I don't mean hooking up to the RF or composite video input, but directly connecting to the guts of it to get a crisp bitmapped image.
by jimmaswell on 12/5/19, 4:07 AM