by forgotmypw3 on 10/27/19, 12:09 AM with 59 comments
by gnicholas on 10/27/19, 5:02 AM
It may be possible to follow most/all such advice when building an app or website, but surely it is not possible for presentations (which have to be consumed in the same format by everyone present). Some may hate dark text on a light background; others may find that the only suitable format.[1] So when I read posts like these, I don't view them as imperatives ("never do X") but rather as data points to be factored into decision-making processes.
This is easiest when the post explains the problem and gives various alternatives and explains why they provide a better experience. When they just leave it at "never do X", I'm left wondering whether Y is better than Z or vice-versa. I wish the author had given more context about why this is bad for astigmatism, or what sorts of things are better than others (in terms of ranking alternatives).
1: I hear from people who say that the only decent color scheme for BeeLine Reader (my text accessibility startup) is bright red and bright blue. But other people tell me that color scheme is terrible and shouldn't be the default on my website because it is so bad. You literally cannot please all of the people all of the time! [edited]
by DubiousPusher on 10/27/19, 4:30 AM
In fact I often create white on black content because it is easy for me to author and read. I also have significant color blindness and am totally unsure which color combinations are hard for others to read, may not show up on a projector, may be a faux pas or may be gaurish.
And this is the profound difficulty of creating accessible content. What is accessible for one is often not accessible for others with a different disability. Simply saying don't do this or don't do that has long ceased to be considered a good method of creating accessible content. This has been abandoned in favor of using a broad suite of tools to validate content meets a wide array of accessibility needs.
Edit: I have never looked into whether such a tool exists for common slide presentation apps.
by astura on 10/27/19, 5:11 AM
Not really a fan of the ranty style without a solution.
On top of that, like another commentor mentioned, people with astygmatism typically wear glasses or contacts?
by pcr0 on 10/27/19, 4:42 AM
by dwoozle on 10/27/19, 4:17 AM
by localhost on 10/27/19, 5:10 AM
by sysbin on 10/27/19, 4:20 AM
by RenRav on 10/27/19, 4:20 AM
by nullc on 10/27/19, 5:40 AM
It would be somewhat surprising otherwise-- the relevant part of vision for this is linear and should work the same in both directions. Though if the room is so dark that my puples will be dilated then that is obviously going to cause a loss of acuity ... but if that is what the author is going for then the advice should be to not present in a pitch black room.
In a dimmer room I have a small preference for white (or green/amber) on black so that the overall brightness isn't blowing out my vision.
Blue focuses noticeably worse, so I have serious trouble reading things like blue on black or black on blue... esp if the blue is some fancy LED sign or something that uses a shorter wavelength.
I think articles like this that don't support their advice with some kind of study of many people ... is pretty low value because it's too likely to just be repeating the author's own personal preferences and disguising them as research supported Truths.
Safer advice would be: Some people have poor vision, make your text extra big and clear even if you could read something less legible.
by Hnrobert42 on 10/27/19, 5:16 AM
by ars on 10/27/19, 5:15 AM
The reason is very simple: There's less light coming from the screen into my eye.
Every monitor I've ever owned I reduce the brightness to the lowest setting possible, and they are still too bright.
Green is best because the high resolution parts of your eye only see green. So the blue and red components of white are just unnecessary extra light.
by apocalypstyx on 10/27/19, 4:35 AM
(Interestingly enough, I too have an astigmatism in one eye, but I don't know if that's the sole cause of my discomfort.)
by colorincorrect on 10/27/19, 4:37 AM
any suggestions? my intuitive response to this would be black on brightly hued navy blue, but i worry that is also low-contrast, which also causes issues.
can't please everyone!
by etaioinshrdlu on 10/27/19, 6:05 AM
by blunte on 10/27/19, 5:19 AM
The worst are websites with white text on black backgrounds. Arstechnica used to do this, and I was unable to read more than a paragraph or two. Then when I would leave and go back to normal sites, I would have all kinds of weird ghost blocks in my vision (character sized).
by chris_wot on 10/27/19, 4:47 AM
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/mourning-has-broken...
by jnwatson on 10/27/19, 5:26 AM
by zczc on 10/27/19, 5:54 AM
by detaro on 10/27/19, 11:51 PM
by packetized on 10/27/19, 4:48 AM
by knolax on 10/27/19, 5:23 AM