by singingwolfboy on 10/6/19, 9:35 PM with 167 comments
by m_sahaf on 10/6/19, 10:29 PM
by dang on 10/6/19, 10:37 PM
by Unklejoe on 10/7/19, 12:32 PM
It basically gives you all of the premium features for free, as opposed to the official server which requires a license.
I really wanted to run the official server, but they offered no option of a lifetime license (only a yearly license). For what it's worth, I would have been willing to pay a lot more for a license that never expired.
The whole reason I'm hosting the server myself in the first place is because I want _full_ control, so a subscription based license doesn't really fit well there.
Given that the project is licensed under the GPL, the license is effectively a donation anyway, so I hope they consider offering a lifetime license for those who want to self-host.
by bad_user on 10/7/19, 7:07 AM
The pricing is odd. For example you can't self host it yourself without paying for a license. The code is AFAIK open source, so you could maintain your own fork with the required code branches removed, if you wanted to. I do hope the author doesn't pull a bait and switch, after enough users go down this route. Don't get me wrong, I'm actually not looking into hosting it myself, I'm glad to pay for a hosted service, but with open source I want that possibility to be there and I don't want licensing per user for self-hosting either.
And currently I like what the author has been doing. Adding some code in there that makes it require a license, but that you can remove, is totally fine. But I'm seeing more and more open source apps turning proprietary nowadays and I don't look kindly to such bait and switches, because I end up using those apps because they are open source. Like it is the case for Bitwarden, otherwise there are often better proprietary options available.
From a usability standpoint, Bitwarden is unfortunately inferior to 1Password in every way. But it works fine for our purposes, for now. And Bitwarden is better than LastPass in case you're wondering, even if it has some missing features.
The official servers are slow. I just had multiple login failures. I'm assuming that it's experiencing issues due to being featured on HN right now, but this isn't the first time that it's happening.
But as long as it is _open source_ and as long as it does a reasonable job, then I'll keep supporting it. Because I'd rather pay for open source solutions.
by fbnlsr on 10/7/19, 7:53 AM
Anyways, BitWarden works absolutely flawlessly. There are a few things here and there that I'd wish it had, like the ability to create templates for custom categories, but apart from that, it does an amazing job. The websites autocomplete works really well, and I was pleased to see that I can unlock my vault on my phone with my fingerprint reader.
Migrating data from KeePassXC to BitWarden went smoothly. I took a moment to clean my database and reorganize a few stuff. The database takes a bit of time to load, but nothing that's a real bother.
The only thing I don't store in BitWarden is the 2FA TOTP I use (mainly Google Authenticator) as I feel it breaks the entire concept for 2FA. I've seen people on HN do it, but to me it just feels wrong.
by justin_oaks on 10/7/19, 3:11 AM
Has anyone else been successfully using Bitwarden in a team setting? If so, how do you work around the limitation I mentioned and other such things?
by sdan on 10/6/19, 10:19 PM
Although it is a bit of a hassle to setup on mobile devices (I use Pass for iOS), the security and functionality it provides is worth it.
by dev_dull on 10/6/19, 10:18 PM
Create the encrypted vault in your preferred cloud storage service and locally and sync across all devices.
by alistproducer2 on 10/6/19, 10:56 PM
by pkalinowski on 10/7/19, 12:55 PM
1Password pros:
* very polished UI, pleasure to use
* good UX in general
1Password cons:
* I have constant issues with it loosing connection with browser. Extension just randomly stops working for few days. Tried to fix it multiple times, never succeeded
* Price (too expensive for my private use)
Bitwarden pros:
* Free
* Very simple app, easy to use
* More reliable than 1Password for me
* Fills login pages quicker than 1Password
* Feels quicker and more snappy than 1Password
Bitwarden cons:
* Lacks 1Password polish, generally UX and UI needs some work
* Can't login using fingerprint on Mac
* Crashes on my iPad when trying to save new credentials (need to report it as a bug, but I didn't go around to it yet)
* Slow on Android
All in all, I'm very satisfied with Bitwarden and use it daily.
by dangom on 10/6/19, 10:18 PM
by mwexler on 10/7/19, 1:27 PM
by theta_d on 10/7/19, 12:17 PM
by theferalrobot on 10/6/19, 10:42 PM
* It stores an encrypted file on a cloud storage platform of your choice (gdrive/dropbox etc) and syncs across devices. * No subscription fees
by strathos on 10/7/19, 5:34 AM
So that might have sounded like a rant, but my only issue was that I didn't understand the pricing for self-hosted. My one year is up soon and I will be renewing my license as we've (as in me and my wife) been happy with Bitwarden.
by IronWolve on 10/7/19, 1:49 AM
I use the bitwardern docker version for people to use, I have it installed, but for my own use, sticking with keepass.
by jf on 10/6/19, 10:18 PM
by shelune on 10/7/19, 1:51 PM
Would recommend it to everyone in need of a password manager now.
by brunoqc on 10/6/19, 10:52 PM
by RHSeeger on 10/7/19, 5:39 PM
by rb666 on 10/7/19, 11:54 AM
by thatthatis on 10/7/19, 11:33 AM
For example, can I share a password with both “marketing” and “customer support”
The lack of this is one of the biggest pains I have with LastPass
by thrownaway954 on 10/7/19, 12:12 PM
Bitwarden is great for personal use, but I can't use it at work cause of this one missing feature. If anyone knows of a way to make it have multiple logins per site, I'm all ears as I would love to get rid of DashLane and it's horrible Chrome Extension.
by infinityplus1 on 10/7/19, 4:10 AM
by joe_the_user on 10/6/19, 10:28 PM
I just had a thought. What I would like is password protected, "password notepad". When activated, it remembers the text of passwords, shows it to you in text when you go to a website and then you type it into the site. (people looking over your shoulder is a way overestimated danger, the password-hiding thing dates to shared terminals).
The thing I hate about password managers is I am afraid I would stop knowing my passwords. This would allow me to remember my passwords since I would type them each time.
I've only seen Firefox and Chrome's built-in password managers so maybe this exists already. But it seems a decent way to do it.