by gopi on 9/30/19, 6:23 PM with 80 comments
by seltzered_ on 9/30/19, 7:18 PM
by zaroth on 9/30/19, 6:54 PM
Personally, I think if someone wants to pay the way of, let’s say, 300 students to get full scholarships, so that their child can attend, this seems like a very sustainable model which benefits everyone involved.
$37 million buys a lot of resources so arguably this isn’t taking a spot away from anyone, if anything it is enabling these universities to provide more spots to students who deserve them, potentially at zero cost.
by joefourier on 9/30/19, 7:15 PM
I don't understand how sending your child to those institutions is worth $37 million. Wouldn't it make more sense to give it to them directly, or as funding for one of their ventures?
From other articles, their daughter became a comedy writer for Jimmy Fallon - that seems like the last profession to require a diploma from an elite university, or even a college diploma at all.
by gbronner on 9/30/19, 6:50 PM
by 14 on 9/30/19, 6:54 PM
by WalterBright on 9/30/19, 7:37 PM
by zarro on 9/30/19, 7:04 PM
1. Arbitrarily small class sizes - the degree is not so much about the education as it is about the prestige of being in small class size. But long term, who cares? There are obviously candidates that have equal or higher capability if the universities can limit the class size. Besides those that don't go have cheaper market rates and are more attractive investments since the universities strategy is pretty much increase the demand by lowering supply arbitrarily.
2. The idea that you buy merit that is undeserved. To be honest, I am not sure why this is a big deal. Its not in the universities long term best interest to give its clients undeserved merit, because the market decides their merit, and if they pump out people that don't have skills over time their "Prestige" doesn't amount to much, and their customers will go elsewhere. To be honest, I think this is already starting to be the case.
Really I think this argument boils down to distasteful envy and jealousy of the things rich people can "buy", which if you examine it carefully isn't the case anyway.
by rolltiide on 9/30/19, 7:13 PM
The people with the most influence have so many intertwined unspoken relationships that there is no benefit to addressing whatever the underclass is talking about.
Coupled with the idea that many of their own children aren't even aware of what level of skill they demonstrated versus their family's money and clout. Many of them are oblivious to what other people struggle with, even if they are able to apply themselves in the same ways.
by kolbe on 9/30/19, 6:48 PM
Hard to reconcile that with David not choosing to fly private. Maybe he has environmental concerns, but I would guess he exclusively flies private, especially since this article claims he's a little OCD about controlling every part of every process.
With regards to "buying" his kids' way into college, it doesn't look like there's any evidence that this was David's goal other than coincidental timing. But beyond that, David doesn't need to buy his kids' way into these colleges. Colleges love to accept the children of billionaires. Nothing is better than linking up an intellectual class with the wealthy class, and letting the melding of capital and innovation create powerful and successful alumni.