by reeves23423 on 9/16/19, 12:13 PM with 3 comments
by devnonymous on 9/16/19, 12:42 PM
Secondly, this one passage is an obscure reference. Contrast this for example against the story of Eklavya[1].
Thirdly, this should be seen in the context of story-telling (ie: in the context of mythological fantasy rather than 'endorsement' of any sort)
Fouthly, there isn't one authoritative Ramayana, there are more like 300+[2]
Finally, why does it even matter what RMS cites (doesn't even comment on) ...not even from a primary source ?
Is the fact that these examples exist only interesting because RMS cites it ?
What's the motive behind sharing this ? Both by RMS and by the OP ?
[1] * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekalavya * https://velivada.com/2017/04/27/dalit-history-month-eklavya-...