by wouterinho on 12/16/10, 11:59 AM with 59 comments
by dotBen on 12/16/10, 5:21 PM
This is always a problem when a company is purchased by one of the vendors it sits above in the value chain, esp when impartiality and independence is important in a space such as vendor monitoring.
I can't see RS buying CloudKick for internal monitoring of its own customer's servers and instances because they would already have a mature solution by now.
I'm not sure I want to be providing RackSpace with performance data of my servers running on their competitor's instances, the CloudKick agent is placed to send (albeit transparently) all sorts of data back to RS. And don't be surprised if other vendors raise concerns to this effect too.
by po on 12/16/10, 2:29 PM
I think they would have grown much faster with a smoother price curve. Make a plan with 2 or 3 servers of full monitoring for $30 a month to grab the low end of the market when people are just starting and putting in the foundational pieces of their technology stack.
Overall though, they're really good. They seem to have done plenty well anyway. Congratulations.
by tomhoward on 12/16/10, 12:36 PM
by mbreese on 12/16/10, 12:22 PM
by pdx on 12/16/10, 4:54 PM
The question is, "Why buy, when you can build?"
Let's say I'm Rackspace. I have a cloudkick account that I used when I was evaluating them to see if I wanted to buy them. I know exactly what they offer.
So, let's say I take that and I create an engineering specification. Build a service that does this, this, this, and this, duplicating cloudkick, right down to the screen layout of the dashboards, if you're so inclined.
Now, go hire 10 engineers. No, make it 20. Now hire 5 project managers. Pay each engineer $100K + benefits, say they cost me $150K per year. Pay each project manager $150K + benefits, say they cost me $200K per year. So now I have 20 engineers and 5 project managers whose combined salaries + benefits cost me $4 million a year. Let them work for two years. For $8MM, I have my own cloudkick, right?
Why would I pay more than $8MM? Perhaps they didn't, I don't know. Again, my questions isn't about cloudkick. It's about why you see companies make the buy decision, when it often seems like it would be well within their ability to build it themselves, if they are so willing to spend money.
by revorad on 12/16/10, 12:13 PM
by ericflo on 12/16/10, 6:55 PM
by OoTheNigerian on 12/16/10, 1:15 PM
Now back to work as i wait patiently from my turn. :)
by vidar on 12/16/10, 12:09 PM
by joetyson on 12/16/10, 2:44 PM
by johnyzee on 12/16/10, 12:55 PM
by ConceptDog on 12/16/10, 8:17 PM
by foobarbazetc on 12/17/10, 2:24 AM
by geekinthecorner on 12/16/10, 5:21 PM
I feel bad for Cloudkick as a company, though. San Antonio is a million miles away from San Francisco, culturally. Good job on having an exit, good luck on not hating yourselves in a year.