by ctulek on 5/10/19, 6:58 PM with 45 comments
by benzofuran on 5/11/19, 3:05 AM
I personally think this is due to the infantilization in part of a lot of media outlets, where the emphasis has been placed on getting the ideas into the most hands possible instead of folks who'd actually benefit. Focusing the faires around 3D printing geegaws and cosplay items is fine if you want to make numbers, but you get consumers and the followons, and not creators from that.
You can think of it in the same vein as Marvel movies or Harry Potter books - low content, low thinking media that raises insane amounts of money based on appealing to the mass market and the wannabe 'geek' crowd that doesn't tend to do much innovating except in consumption methods.
by lazzlazzlazz on 5/10/19, 11:32 PM
More uniformity, more emphasis on unrelated consumer products like pre-prepared food offerings, less emphasis on interesting electronics kits. Maybe I became jaded, but maybe Maker Faire has tried to target a lower and lower common denominator in an effort to boost revenues.
by alunaryak on 5/11/19, 2:03 AM
I wonder if it would be financially tenable if they scale it down and get back that home grown feel. Then again the bay area is a very different place now.
by mceachen on 5/10/19, 7:11 PM
How do the economics not work out here? 100-150K visitors/year, each dropping (on average? $20 for entrance ticket)?
Don't they require commercial presenters to pay for their space?
How much does it cost to rent the San Mateo Fairgrounds?
by newnewpdro on 5/11/19, 4:34 AM
Long ago it was full of grassroots makers showing off their DIY stuff but it quickly became a commercialized trade show targeting these folks and their audience as consumers instead of hosting them.
by gaze on 5/11/19, 3:07 AM
Or well, scaled back significantly in comparison to a decade ago.
by jpm_sd on 5/11/19, 4:07 AM
by mirimir on 5/11/19, 4:48 AM