by spondyl on 1/17/19, 10:43 AM
I presume the domain name is a violation of the Docker trademark, seeing as it could potentially be confused for an official product (as it uses the Docker name)
by onion2k on 1/17/19, 9:34 AM
There is no way I'd trust that with my containers. Most of the website is fake (as in just text rather than links).
by codegladiator on 1/17/19, 9:37 AM
by amanzi on 1/17/19, 10:13 AM
Didn't work for me either. First time I tried nothing happened - just hung, the second time it started to build an nginx container but failed with a permission denied error. Also the only link that works is the link to Github.
by zimbatm on 1/17/19, 11:00 AM
by rorychatt on 1/17/19, 10:30 PM
Can you talk to the problem Docker-Run is trying to solve? It's already relatively easy to deploy docker containers today (AWS/Azure/GCP/DigitalOcean/etc) and even have them pipe to the browser like this.
Without an ecosystem of services to integrate (Identity/Storage/DB/Queue/DNS/LB/Network/etc), containers aren't awfully useful.
What is the differentiator?
EDIT: grammar
by CaptainJustin on 1/17/19, 10:37 AM
Maybe it's just the avalanche of HN traffic but I can't get to your pricing tab (or the others)
by thecopy on 1/17/19, 9:47 AM
I dont understand what provlem this service would solve?
Also, nginx:latest doesnt work with error WebSocket connection to 'wss://api.docker-run.com/' failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 502
by 1023bytes on 1/17/19, 11:17 AM
Doesn't seem very sustainable, what's the business model?
by captn3m0 on 1/17/19, 8:13 PM
Next thing you'd want is docker-compose support for multiple containers running together
by lixtra on 1/17/19, 10:54 AM
Is "Docker Dun (beta)" the intended page title?
by dhux on 1/17/19, 10:36 AM
Nice, it worked for me.