by sparkzilla on 12/4/18, 11:22 PM with 18 comments
by sparkzilla on 12/5/18, 12:09 AM
by sxates on 12/4/18, 11:37 PM
by BugsJustFindMe on 12/5/18, 1:21 AM
24fps isn't some magically "correct" frame rate. It's very slow and significantly constrains the viable range of camera work. I wish I could see what all the fuss is about here.
by slr555 on 12/5/18, 4:32 AM
For movie fans it's a different story. People want a certain filmic softness to motion pictures. Motion smoothing makes a lot of content look like it was shot with very deep focus. The soap opera effect. Early video cameras were not super versatile in terms of depth of field.
I guess my question for the engineers here is this. It there a way to encode a content type code within the signal or the sideband (if that's the right term) that sets could use to automatically optimize their settings. It's not like sports fans ever say, "hey I love those artifacts", or movie buffs "hey, I want it to look like Search for Tomorrow".
by adetrest on 12/5/18, 2:08 AM
See https://priceonomics.com/why-every-movie-looks-sort-of-orang...
by lostgame on 12/5/18, 12:52 AM
by dragonwriter on 12/5/18, 12:14 AM
“Turn off motion smoothing”.
by sjg007 on 12/5/18, 2:15 AM
by classichasclass on 12/5/18, 1:07 AM