by kenneth on 5/8/18, 4:36 AM with 50 comments
by alexhutcheson on 5/8/18, 6:38 PM
by esaym on 5/8/18, 6:44 PM
Certainly an interesting read. But with a little more historical context, you will find that even as early as the 1930's, the US was worried about dominance in the Pacific. They used the consumer travel market and Pan Am as an excuse to built bases and refueling networks all across the Pacific. Quite good foresight that certainly helped out once WWII broke out. (there's another book with these details but I can't remember the name of it)
by tlb on 5/8/18, 7:22 PM
"Remains" is stretching the point. The original 747 (1975) was 195ft wingspan. Modern 787s are also around 195ft. The 767-200 (1981) is comparable at 156ft.
By weight, the 314 was small by modern standards: 84000 lbs MTOW, less than a 737-200 at 128000 lbs MTOW.
by 8_hours_ago on 5/8/18, 6:37 PM
by ocdtrekkie on 5/8/18, 6:33 PM
by peterburkimsher on 5/9/18, 8:28 AM
Wikipedia says the registration was NC-18609(A), not NC18602 as in the article. I also noticed that the photo of the first ever Boeing 314 shows registration NC18601, which would make 18602 the second model ever built. Can anyone confirm which registration number is correct?
by clon on 5/8/18, 8:08 PM
There seems to be a healthy number of other pilots / aviation enthusiasts here, so I'll ask - did they really use the OVER & OUT in aviation phraseology back then? Modern aviation RT omits these, so I wonder if it is a journalistic addition.
by elihu on 5/8/18, 10:06 PM
by overcast on 5/9/18, 1:19 PM
by imglorp on 5/9/18, 1:24 PM
https://www.futilitycloset.com/2018/04/16/podcast-episode-19...
by thedrbrian on 5/9/18, 12:49 PM
by Twirrim on 5/8/18, 7:01 AM