by LuisOrtiz on 3/14/18, 2:14 PM with 82 comments
by gtrubetskoy on 3/14/18, 3:31 PM
https://www.amazon.com/State-Secrets-Insiders-Chronicle-Chem...
by alva on 3/14/18, 4:05 PM
1. President Trumps response (and I am not a hardcore anti-Trumper) has been very weak. Many here are extremely disappointed.
2. The leader of the opposition is not supporting the government position and is propagating doubt far harder than is appropriate. There should always be some doubt in these situations but to immediately suggest this is a plot to frame Russia is something else. Rumours of mutiny are spreading and the majority of the Labour party directly and indirectly criticised his position during session.
Highly concerning situation. I truly hope Trump comes out with much stronger language in support of what we consider a top ally.
by whb07 on 3/14/18, 3:58 PM
There are other suitable parts of the world to be exiled to and maybe the US would be a safer spot for you to enjoy your wealth while being relatively more 'safe'. Granted, if the FSB(really the KGB) want you killed it doesn't matter where but UK seems like an easier opponent to push away than the troubles that might rise from US gov.
by OrganicMSG on 3/14/18, 3:02 PM
It could just be a massive coincidence, however there do seem to be a lot of coincidences to write off if we are to assume that the trail of dead Russians does not lead to Russia.
by aleyan on 3/14/18, 3:42 PM
As for Skripal, he allegedly blew the cover of 300 Russian agents. That is a lot of people with a personal motive. Perhaps an investigation is in order before Britain and Russia tear their relationship apart over this.
by Dowwie on 3/14/18, 5:43 PM
This entire story smells of conspiracy.
by molszanski on 3/14/18, 4:18 PM
a) Why would Russia do that?
b) Why would they do that in a way that would finger point the blame on them?
by amriksohata on 3/14/18, 8:13 PM
by fenk85 on 3/14/18, 3:51 PM
Russia will blame everyone and use the usual whataboutism arguments, we already had Russian ambassador on CNN yesterday trying to float conspiracy theory that US done it because Russia destroyed all their chemical weapons and US has not (i kid you not)
Sanctions will be announced by western countries, but not implemented (whatever dirt they have on Trump must be good)
Everyone will forget and move on
Few years later proof will be found, but by that stage no one will care, case in hand Russian antiaircraft technology "falling" into rebel hands and shooting down a passenger plane a few years ago.
by lowry on 3/14/18, 3:07 PM
by apo on 3/14/18, 3:47 PM
I've seen no evidence whatsoever that the alleged attack was carried out by Russia.
Novichok agents were developed in the 1970s, have been the topic of many publications, and the simple and widely-known chemical structures of any number of them could be made by chemists from any country or group willing to take the risk to make them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novichok_agent
If Britain is intent on dragging NATO into this, as it seems like it might be, there had better be far more compelling evidence of Russia's involvement than the weak drivel published to date.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/13/nerve-agent-...
Remember yellowcake?
by hugh4life on 3/14/18, 3:02 PM
by jingleheimer on 3/14/18, 4:44 PM
The novichok agents are not that hard to make and many labs around the world have the capability and the research licences to make it. The factors tying them to Russia would be trace chemicals, similar to how you can trace gold. It'll be easy to lie about the origin so long as no-one else has access to the chemicals to test them.
Theresa May is a very weak position politically. The industrial size gang rape cover ups that came out recently didn't help. The ongoing Brexit negotiation failures are not helping. It's only a matter of time before she's replaced. Picking a fight with Russia makes her look stronger. If you want another laugh, consider that the UK thinks it has a 'special relationship' with the US which will allow them to get a favourable trading deal afterwards.
Until I see more evidence, e.g. play by play surveillance, I will remain unconvinced.