by pshin45 on 3/10/18, 7:36 PM with 11 comments
by skookum on 3/10/18, 9:58 PM
How does the author justify wasting bits on this in 2018? The righting of wrongs: "the result of all this low-quality Bitcoin journalism is that most newcomers never get to learn about all the new and exciting things made possible by Bitcoin’s core technology."
by floatboth on 3/10/18, 9:59 PM
A radically terrible one. The financial system should not waste gigantic amounts of power on maintaining security under trustlessness. Unlike libertarians' ridiculous dreams, actual human society requires trust.
> This transaction was transmitted and processed instantly, for $0 in fees
No way it's been $0. And it's even worse now. Confirmations are slow, miner fees are large, exchanges have fees, you can quickly lose on exchange rate…
(Mining rewards are mentioned later in the article… but not where they come from)
> As the number of independent mining groups increases and becomes more geographically dispersed
Still a few large pools dominate the network https://blockchain.info/pools
> [cash] also means that they could be robbed of their entire life savings on any given day
There's a whole subreddit, /r/Buttcoin, full of stories of bitcoiners losing their life savings on any given day. Scams, hacks, bugs, private key losses, scams, scams, and even more scams.
by Yizahi on 3/10/18, 10:02 PM
Maybe I'm wrong and don't see some really long term perspective, well then I'll admit it. For now I don't use any of them.
by jacobr on 3/10/18, 9:34 PM
> And this isn’t just theoretical. It happens every day on the Bitcoin network.
I'm not 100% convinced about a wide spread adoption of decentralized cryptocurrencies, but if it is to happen it will be a coin with low or zero fees. What OP is not honest about is that there are no transactions on the Bitcoin network with low or zero fees.
by bitconion on 3/11/18, 8:23 AM