by alphonsegaston on 1/25/18, 5:19 PM with 70 comments
by PopePompous on 1/25/18, 5:46 PM
by jMyles on 1/25/18, 6:17 PM
"Scientists <verb>."
Nobody cares that "scientists" did something. We care about the science of what they did, sure. But this is a built-in appeal to authority that seems completely anti-hacker to me.
by elmerfud on 1/25/18, 5:26 PM
by mLuby on 1/25/18, 6:07 PM
What they should be doing is providing a confidence level of nuclear war, eg 3±2% chance of nuclear war in 2018.
Furthermore, conflating nuclear apocalypse with other existential threats to humanity (climate change, disease, asteroid, gamma ray burst, vacuum decay, etc.) is at best confusing. I guess a general "5% chance irrevocable extinction event begins in 2018" would have some value, it would be far better to report on individual extinction vectors so we can prioritize countermeasures.
by tambienben on 1/25/18, 5:51 PM
So... depending on how they meant to word that, are they seriously wagging their finger at the public for not blindly falling in line behind this unprecedented, petty shit-show? That's an impressive amount of hubris.
by ghostbrainalpha on 1/25/18, 6:04 PM
"Doomsday Clock #3" is out today from D.C. comics.
It's a mega event that crosses characters from Alan Moore's The Watchmen with more traditional D.C. characters like Batman and Superman. I'm enjoying it quite a bit even though its exploitative and somewhat tarnishes the legacy of the greatest comic book of all time.
by badmadrad on 1/25/18, 6:04 PM
by PopePompous on 1/25/18, 6:00 PM
by creaghpatr on 1/25/18, 5:27 PM
by martin1975 on 1/25/18, 6:28 PM
by kbutler on 1/25/18, 6:57 PM
"The world has seen the threat posed by the misuse of information technology and witnessed the vulnerability of democracies to disinformation."
2 minutes to midnight in 1953:
"from Moscow to Chicago, atomic explosions will strike midnight for Western civilization."
https://thebulletin.org/timeline
Are they being secretly ironic, giving an example of "fake news"? (To be fair, the longer statement is more detailed than their summary.)
by Balgair on 1/25/18, 8:59 PM
To note:
NK's latest public test would kill ~33 mi^2. Not a lot of fun.
The US's Castle Bravo kills ~1,400 mi^2, most of the DMV region.
The USSR's Tzar Bomba kills ~6,600 mi^2, nearly the entire LA basin.
http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/
Pro-tip: The button sizes don't matter
by Alex3917 on 1/25/18, 5:32 PM
by lagadu on 1/25/18, 6:05 PM
Sure, it'd be remembered in history books forever and up to hundreds of millions would die but this wouldn't even register on a "doomsday" scale.
by dkonofalski on 1/25/18, 5:27 PM
by KillerRAK on 1/25/18, 6:23 PM
by thrillgore on 1/25/18, 9:54 PM
by ataturk on 1/25/18, 5:24 PM
by ebbv on 1/25/18, 6:12 PM
If you don’t think the way Trump and Kim Jong Un have been interacting is a reason for concern I don’t even know what to say to you.
And the point of this isn’t to make people panic, it’s to point out how dangerous of a situation we are in and maybe get people to think about it and change course in some way.
by louithethrid on 1/25/18, 5:40 PM
So much for percived danger and actuall danger.