by thunk on 8/10/10, 2:53 AM with 185 comments
by neilk on 8/10/10, 5:48 AM
I met a woman from New York who was visiting SF. We both had been to Burning Man. She expressed her distaste at how much time San Franciscans spend on their art projects. According to her, New Yorkers "have a life".
So, that bar conversation ended pretty quickly. But later on I got to thinking about it. There might be positive senses of "having a life", but I think she meant it in the more common way -- a horror of getting too enthusiastic about anything.
Oh yeah, we could plant a rose garden in our backyard, but you know, we have lives.
It makes me feel tired just contemplating it.
by rdtsc on 8/10/10, 5:17 AM
Do it during lunch, after work, after dinner. On the weekend , for a longer walk. Parks and trails work best. Less crowded streets in the city work as well.
Don't rush, just walk slowly.
Observe things.
If you end up thinking about the problem your are working on, that's fine, if you notice a bird's nest, that's fine too.
Walk like you have no place to be, look around. You will feel weird at first, but that's fine. Try not to care about that.
Think of it as something between meditation, relaxation and exercise. Sort of a all-in-one.
It's easy. There is nothing you have to do to plan for it, no special gear to buy, all you need to do is to say "I want to take a walk" and then ... take a walk.
by nhebb on 8/10/10, 5:47 AM
Now I live in the outskirts of Portland, in a place with modern suburbs grown up around a quaint old town. Sidewalks are everywhere. I take walks all the time, and I see other people out for walks daily.
It's seems like common sense that urban and neighborhood design can have a huge impact on the livability of an area, but a lot of the suburbs created in the US abandoned the sidewalk to save a few bucks and cram more houses per acre. I don't know if the tide has turned, but I'd never live in a neighborhood without sidewalks again.
Home buying tip: Look for a neighborhood with a strip of grass between the sidewalk and the street. It's a small detail that has a big impact on "neighborhood" feel.
by jasonkester on 8/10/10, 6:38 AM
It's just a lot more walkable here. In Pamplona I could walk out my front door and be blasted with the fact that I was in a medieval walled city with cobbled streets and narrow alleyways. Any direction I went had some guaranteed Cool Stuff to pass by and probably would end me up perched on some 600 year old military fortification looking out over the farms.
Contrast that to living in a typical LA suburb with no sidewalks and nothing to see apart from apartment complexes and possibly a Starbucks if you press on far enough. It sorta sucks the fun out of the experience.
I've definitely done my share of walking in the 'states too, but then I've made a point of living in some pretty walkable places. NW Portland and Venice spring to mind as places I spent a ton of time simply wandering around.
Other places I've lived... San Gabriel, Tigard, Gresham... Not much walking.
I think maybe it has more to do with where you are than who you are.
by euroclydon on 8/10/10, 3:06 AM
by vgr on 8/10/10, 4:15 PM
A few quick adds, since I seem to have mildly offended some of you.
0. The tangent on "having a life" here is fascinating. Nothing to add, but I am now seriously curious about the ethnography of that phrase.
1. Is this anti-American? I don't really think so. There is research (see Robert Levine, "The Geography of Time") that shows that cultures have characteristic tempos, down to typical walking speeds. Yes, the vastness of America has something to do with it, but I think 80% of the dynamics are social, not physical, and also relatively recent (cellphones etc. have helped Americans express this preference a lot more clearly). Back before Thoreau's time, I think this wasn't so characteristic of America. There are no better celebrations of idleness than the works of that uber-American writer, Mark Twain. The disease is fairly new.
2. "If you are thinking about blogging about your judgments of how others are not taking a walk, then YOU are not taking a walk." Very fair and Godelian critique, but I am talking about idle foot-and-mind wandering here, not meditation. I'll leave that kind of walking to the Zen monks. My model isn't a Zen monk, it is Tom Sawyer walking along kicking a can or something. The xkcd Bored with the Internet strip http://xkcd.com/77/ is sort of my point as well, except that I still take walks anyway, despite the irony.
3. If I came across as judgmental or telling people how to actually take walks... sorry. Meant to be mostly tongue-in-cheek :) Poor writing execution, not intent.
by techiferous on 8/10/10, 5:35 AM
When I had some time in the evenings to come up with material I would sit at home without much inspiration. However, I found that when I walked to the convenience store to get a snack, I would inevitably return with at least one new joke idea, maybe more.
Walking was such a predictably good way to loosen up my creativity that when I got stuck I would head for the door and tell my wife, "I'm going to the convenience store to buy a joke."
by JacobAldridge on 8/10/10, 5:20 AM
"Some people walk in the rain, and some people just get wet."
Be someone who walks in the rain.
by docgnome on 8/10/10, 6:13 AM
"Thousands of tired, nerve-shaken, over-civilized people are beginning to find out that going to the mountain is going home; that wildness is necessity; that mountain parks and reservations are useful not only as fountains of timber and irrigating rivers, but as fountains of life."
I find more enjoyment in a simple hike through a forest than I've had at work for a very long time. Also, I find that when I go back to work after a trip to the forest or even just a walk outside the city, I feel better and am less crabby about going back to work. I think this is something that is sorely lacking in many people's lives. Not recreation but just being out in whatever wild we have left. Aaand now I sound like a crazy hippie.
by bootload on 8/10/10, 7:32 AM
The author is correct observing nobody walking any more. I see a lot of runners who I join occasionally and the only consistent walkers the elderly (fit) and ethnic (fit). Why? Well people don't see the value in it and simply write it off as wasted time. Here's the thing, the benefits are cumulative so it might appear a waste of time but the advantages (fitness, psych, clean air, thinking) roll on, the more consistent you are.
[0] Last year I clocked up 2000K ~ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bootload/sets/72157623445003205... This year I walked 240km from Canberra to Mt.Kosciuszko (9 days) ~ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bootload/collections/7215762379... This month I covered all of the city of Singapore on foot in 2 days ~ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bootload/collections/7215762454...
[1] Because every time I saved up enough money for a car I bought a new PC.
by frobozz on 8/10/10, 10:30 AM
> If you pass anybody, you are not walking slowly enough for it to be “taking a walk.”
There are people around who walk painfully slowly. When I go for a walk, I let my legs swing at a natural cadence, with my natural stride length. If I have to change that, to ensure I don't overtake some dawdler, it places a stupidly unnecessary restriction on the definition of "taking a walk". IMO, it removes some of the idleness from it if you have to actually think about how you are walking.
by gcheong on 8/10/10, 6:57 AM
by derefr on 8/10/10, 4:01 AM
> If you need to listen to music while walking, don’t walk; and don’t listen to music.
I tend to never listen to music unless I'm taking a walk. I have no anxiety about idleness, but I do have an acute anxiety about others' opinions of my taste in music—it is such that I can only stand to enjoy music when there is no one close enough to me to hear it. Seeing as I live in an apartment with thin walls, this means going for a walk.
by balding_n_tired on 8/10/10, 1:36 PM
Where in the world does this man take walks? Down the median of I-5?
I have a hard time coming up with a reason that "taking a walk" must exclude walking the dog; taking with a friend; even chatting on the phone, though that's not my habit. Nor can I see why one may not pass anybody--in a walking part of the world does one end up with large queues of walkers with the tail end going slower and slower?
I write this having just walked in to work, a bit less than an hour, right around half an hour slower than riding the bus. Yes it is purposeful, but it is not the most time-efficient way of accomplishing the purpose.
by pjscott on 8/10/10, 5:56 AM
They're also good for just relaxing.
by michaelfairley on 8/10/10, 5:26 AM
The author has clearly never lived in Texas during the summer. (A decent-length leisurely walk around Austin at midnight during this time of the year will inevitably result in more than enough sweat.)
by dchs on 8/10/10, 8:20 AM
- Seneca
by neutronicus on 8/10/10, 2:34 PM
Something about the scale of the American suburb makes walking totally infuriating for me. I need the wind in my hair and the landscape sliding by to really relax - inching by the same cookie-cutter houses every day kills me.
I enjoy walking in the city or the park, but I can't just impromptu do that.
by johnfn on 8/10/10, 4:44 AM
What I don't see is why it had to have an anti-American bias. It doesn't help make your point, and all it does is antagonize your American readers. I am an American, I also take walks.
by jleader on 8/10/10, 5:35 AM
by leftblank64 on 8/10/10, 5:35 AM
by d0m on 8/10/10, 4:12 AM
The last few paragraphs were the most interesting in my opinion if you don't have the time to read it all.
by k3dz on 8/10/10, 5:42 AM
by kalmar on 8/10/10, 5:49 AM
I believe this is quite similar to bringing your mind back to the breath in sitting meditation in Vipassana and similar practices, though others may correct me. The difference here is that it's perhaps somehow more obvious when your mind has strayed from its object. In fact, there are forms of walking meditation in Vipassana and other practices. These focus -- again, I believe -- much more on the walking: the walking and its sensations are the object. Generally you would walk up and down a short stretch; this avoid the worry of a route, or how to return to the starting point.
by araneae on 8/10/10, 1:54 PM
by warwick on 8/10/10, 4:29 AM
In much the same way that starting the day with breakfast gives my days a sense of rhythm, walking once a week gives my weeks a good demarcation.
by joshu on 8/10/10, 4:15 AM
by foxtrot on 8/12/10, 6:33 PM
I take "walks", however not in the sense of the article. I find that a walk before work is great and on your lunch if you have had a crappy morning. However I walk with a purpose, I think about thinks I see, get my brain interested in stuff I wouldn't usually think about. It gives inspiration and helps figure out problems that otherwise seemed impossible to overcome.
by newmediaclay on 8/10/10, 11:48 AM
by city41 on 8/10/10, 5:08 AM
by dionidium on 8/10/10, 5:24 AM
by eitally on 8/10/10, 10:36 AM
by kristiandupont on 8/10/10, 7:43 PM
He takes walks with 100% attention to the immediate sensual inputs. It's basically a kind of meditation.
by jiganti on 8/10/10, 5:24 AM
by wallflower on 8/10/10, 12:34 PM
by acgourley on 8/10/10, 5:56 AM
I just have a lot to do, and when I do have downtime, I prefer to spend it on sites like Hacker News. That's all.
by rue on 8/10/10, 11:47 PM
I think what I really like is the going somewhere part in general, although not necessarily somewhere in particular.
Walking in itself is one of the more pleasant ways of going somewhere nonparticular.
by prs on 8/10/10, 7:31 AM
by Harj on 8/10/10, 5:26 AM
by themanr on 8/10/10, 7:27 AM
by dugmartin on 8/11/10, 2:50 AM
by Qz on 8/10/10, 5:18 AM
by karlzt on 8/11/10, 3:14 AM
by adnam on 8/10/10, 9:58 PM
by karlzt on 8/11/10, 3:05 AM
by jasonwilk on 8/10/10, 5:15 AM