by yanowitz on 11/8/17, 1:22 PM with 216 comments
by acidburnNSA on 11/8/17, 3:02 PM
[1] https://home-assistant.io/, very recently discussed on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15521743
[2] https://partofthething.com/thoughts/adding-a-ir-send-and-rec...
by josteink on 11/8/17, 1:41 PM
Because those are not things you buy to own. Those are things you rent and which only keep working as long the owner is willing to keep them running.
by atsushin on 11/8/17, 2:42 PM
That's just horrid, and a bad look (and bad consumer relations). I might he stating the obvious, but if a company is going to temporarily license a technology and then develop a product for consumer markets they would do well to continually renew their certs. To do otherwise and act how they did seeds doubt: are we simply buying into a temporarily functioning product that can cease functioning at any time at the whim of the manufacturer? If so why are we buying from them at all if the product we get isn't truly ours?
by shalmanese on 11/8/17, 1:37 PM
by edwhitesell on 11/8/17, 1:45 PM
I've been buying used/refurbished 880 remotes online for the last few years. I still think it's the best IR remote ever made.
by crusso on 11/8/17, 2:21 PM
That means that with my receiver and TV, my Xfinity remote is able to control everything I need it to in my entertainment center.
I was getting kind of bummed about the sad state of Logitech Harmony remotes as my old one was failing on me - but it turns out that it no longer matters.
by wjnc on 11/8/17, 3:04 PM
Irregardless of small print, if it's not clear from the outset there is some part of 'lease' (of certificates) involved it seems pretty straightforward to annul your agreement of purchase once the product stops working within the period you could normally have expected it to function correctly. (Even if it is clear from the outset, the day my Philips Netflix-integrated TV With Netflix Button (R) stops showing Netflix, I'm going for it.)
The nice thing about annulment is 100% money back. The less nice thing about anulment is that it is the store that has to pay you back, not the companing producing the product. They need to sort out liability among themselves. It's producers thinking this is acceptable behaviour that starts it. The retailer is only the middle man.
by uptown on 11/8/17, 1:41 PM
They've abandoned the line of products and a class action lawsuit is in process.
by gargravarr on 11/8/17, 3:24 PM
Also: short paragraph: bad news, device being killed. Longer paragraph: sales pitch...
I'll probably keep buying Logitech peripherals because they are very good quality, but the moment they make a cloud-dependent mouse, I'm out.
by Mister_Snuggles on 11/8/17, 3:30 PM
But at it's core, the device is an IR blaster accessible over some sort of network interface. It makes no sense that this would NEED some kind of cloud service for regular operation. I can, however, see two pieces that greatly benefit from a cloud service:
1) Initial setup. There are constantly new TVs, DVD players, cable boxes, etc with their different IR codes and quirks. The cloud service would be a good way to house this database so that it can be continuously updated without needing to push a firmware and/or app update. Each firmware/app update could include a base set of IR codes, or all codes as of the time the update was built, so that you can get base functionality without needing the service. Once you've picked a set of devices it can download the codes once and not require continuous access.
2) TV listings. This seems to be one of the value-added features with the Harmony and there's no realistic way to bake this into the app or firmware. This needs to be a cloud service.
Sure, maybe the TV listings will go away, I get that. I even get that they may want to discontinue the product and no longer support the app. But that's no reason to brick a bunch of devices - just say to people "This is no longer supported, the app may stop working with future OS updates, and the TV listings are going to go away."
Ideally they'd also say "Here's our internal API guide that the hardware guys gave to the software guys, enjoy". And in a perfect world, "Here's the github link to our firmware source code that we just released under a BSD license, enjoy."
by sstorie on 11/8/17, 1:46 PM
by j45 on 11/8/17, 2:34 PM
Ongoing cloud costs for eol products will kill old products quicker.. That shouldn't be connected to, or rely on the cloud.
I own harmony hubs and will have to figure out how to leave.
EDIT: I'll look for products that are hybrid-cloud enabled - ones that offer locally stored and run backends (perhaps an offline-first progressive web apps as control panels that can sync to a cloud API if it exists).
by t0mbstone on 11/8/17, 9:00 PM
So Logitech is going to scrap an ancient piece of hardware that relies on expensive cloud infrastructure and they are willing to give people a newer version that does all of the same things (and more) for free, and people are complaining?
If you don't want companies to do this with cloud based hardware, you will have to be prepared to pay subscription fees to cover ongoing cloud infrastructure costs. The profits from the sale of the device don't stretch to infinity. It's just basic economics.
The other option (if you don't want cloud based infrastructure) is that you could run your own home server, but then you are going to have to worry about 24/7 connectivity, SSL, firewalls, mobile push nightmares, and all that.
by peterwwillis on 11/8/17, 3:34 PM
You don't buy a product which solely depends upon a free online hosted service and then bitch after 7 years of using it for free. Yes, it would be nice if Logitech released its server-side code so people could host the service themselves, but that would require a firmware update too as MyHarmony.com is almost certainly hard-coded in the device.
Personally, I learned this lesson in 2002 when the Dreamcast's online services were terminated after only a year. It's too bad other people didn't seem to notice the parallels in 2011. But the suggestions of "class action lawsuit" is just stupid. You can't sue a corporation into running a free service for you that it never guaranteed in the first place.
by frik on 11/8/17, 1:48 PM
by dantle on 11/8/17, 6:58 PM
I could share more source code if anybody is interested in doing the same thing.
by tyingq on 11/8/17, 1:51 PM
by runamok on 11/9/17, 6:22 PM
by apocalyptic0n3 on 11/8/17, 3:12 PM
by exelius on 11/8/17, 3:31 PM
by johnhenry on 11/8/17, 3:52 PM
by kevin_b_er on 11/8/17, 9:01 PM
by jdlyga on 11/8/17, 4:19 PM
by emodendroket on 11/8/17, 2:49 PM
by jaunkst on 11/8/17, 2:42 PM
by doe88 on 11/8/17, 2:13 PM
by reiichiroh on 11/8/17, 4:33 PM
by fractal618 on 11/8/17, 2:32 PM
by babyfrank on 11/8/17, 2:38 PM