by infosecrf on 7/25/17, 11:36 AM with 14 comments
by wolframio on 7/25/17, 11:54 AM
In addition, we reiterate that Federal law prohibits the operation, marketing, or sale of any type of jamming equipment, including devices that interfere with Wi-Fi, cellular, or public safety communications. Detailed information about the prohibition against jamming is available on the Commission’s website at http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/jammer-enforcement.
If you read the example they gave about a Marriott hotel deauthenticating users it appears the FCC doesn't know the different between that and jamming a signal. Of course they added that catch-all statement that any device that interferes with WiFi communications is illegal. Page 2 of that document states that no commercial establishment is allowed to block WiFi communication but the next paragraph down has the quote I posted above. It would appear that using the deauth feature of the Pineapple is now illegal, unless if I'm misinterpreting this.
by samueloph on 7/25/17, 6:09 PM
Also, i'm the maintainer of mdk3 on Debian and if any mdk3's dev is reading this, please have a look at the patches i applied upon it[2] and consider merging upstream, or putting the code on github.
There's also a manpage[3].
[1]https://packages.debian.org/sid/net/mdk3 [2]https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-security/mdk3.git/tree/de... [3]https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-security/mdk3.git/tree/de...
by blacksmith_tb on 7/25/17, 5:07 PM
by daveloyall on 7/25/17, 7:17 PM
Bonus points and bonus money if it can somehow reveal the physical location of the attacking device. Perhaps in the manner of a Geiger counter (some sound or light changes as you approach the attacker).
by banterfoil on 7/26/17, 5:46 PM
by ram_rattle on 7/25/17, 5:18 PM